Answer:
2, 3, 5
Step-by-step explanation:
The question asking for the linear equation Suzie manipulated. The answer should be equal to the starting equation. So, we just need to manipulate the option to y= mx + c format.
1. y + 7x = 23
y= -7x +23 (false)
2. . –7x + y = 23
y= 7x + 23 (true)
3. 2y – 14x = 46
2y= 14x+ 46
y= 7x +23 (true)
4. y – 7x = –23
y= 7x - 23 (false)
5. 7x – y = –23
-y= -7x -23
y= 7x + 23 (true)
Answer:
c.18
Step-by-step explanation:
32/24=1.33333333333
40/30=1.33333333333
24/1.33333333333=18
Answer:
Given a square ABCD and an equilateral triangle DPC and given a chart with which Jim is using to prove that triangle APD is congruent to triangle BPC.
From the chart, it can be seen that Jim proved that two corresponding sides of both triangles are congruent and that the angle between those two sides for both triangles are also congruent.
Therefore, the justification to complete Jim's proof is "SAS postulate"
Step-by-step explanation:
The answer to this is 720000
Answer:
B. 81 weeks
Step-by-step explanation:
If we plug everything into the equation it should look like this:

Then we would subtract 1 from both sides, then we are left with <em>w:</em>
<em />
<em />
<em />
<em>Hope this helps!</em>