1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
olchik [2.2K]
2 years ago
9

Using a calendar year as an analogy to the geologic time scale, when do the oldest anatomically modern humans appear on earth?

Social Studies
1 answer:
valentinak56 [21]2 years ago
6 0

The oldest human fossils show up at about eleven minutes to midnight on December 31st.

A fossil is any preserved remains, impression, or trace of any once-living thing from a previous geological epoch (from the Classical Latin fossilis, lit. "obtained by digging"). Examples include fossilised bones, shells, exoskeletons, animal or microbe imprints in stone, amber-preserved artefacts, hair, petrified wood, oil, coal, and DNA traces. The fossil record is the collection of all fossils.

The study of fossils, including their age, formation process, and evolutionary importance, is known as palaeontology. The earliest fossils date back between 4.1 billion and 3.48 billion years and are often called fossils if they are more than 10,000 years old

Learn more about Fossil here:

brainly.com/question/6867325

#SPJ4

You might be interested in
During his speech, vince says, "i will get married one day". what type of claim is this?
NeX [460]
Vince's claim is a way of showing certainty. It is an expression of which a person has a total belief of something and he or she would likely believe that is going to happen for sure. It could be seen above as Vince expresses his words in a way that he is sure that he would be married without using words that he is uncertain but instead he is sure of it.
3 0
3 years ago
Mr. Maxwell, an English teacher, thinks all students who play sports are lazy in class. This week, one of the football players d
k0ka [10]
The appropriate response is self-fulfilling prophecy. A self-fulfilling prophecy  is a forecast that straightforwardly or in a roundabout way makes itself turn out to be valid, by the very terms of the prediction itself, because of positive criticism amongst conviction and conduct.
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What is securalism? ​
sineoko [7]

I've heard individuals say things like, "You have to be secular," "I am secular," etc. even in academic contexts. Then there are some who despise secularism as the ruin of this nation. Secularism is viewed as a moral value by the pro-Secularism camp. According to the anti-Secilarim camp, it is equivalent to minoritarianism.

Both parties are mistaken and misinformed.

First and foremost, we need to understand that secularism is NOT for INDIVIDUALS. For the SYSTEM, that is.

Since secularism and religious freedom are mutually exclusive, no constitution that protects religious freedom can also impose secularism on its citizens. A separation from religion is secularism. It is the system, not the individual, that is required to dissociate.

The term "System" designates the complete administrative framework, including each of its constituent and contributing parts. The System includes everything that has to do with administration, formulation and application of policy, and law and justice. These must all be unbiased toward religion. The secular discipline also applies to the political organizations that take part in the process of electing the legislative bodies. Therefore, when a political party makes the claim that it is "secular," it is attempting the age-old ruse of constructing a virtue out of a need. It cannot be anything but secular. Similar to this, a government cannot avoid being secular. The courts, bureaucracy, and legislature all operate similarly. When we refer to ourselves as a "secular nation," we mean this.

Being Secular entails being cut off from Religion. This is a requirement of the Government, not of the people who make up the Government. The same is true of the other institutions that make up the democratic system. Secularism is an institution's character, not the personality of its employees. For instance, the Prime Minister must maintain his secularity while doing his official duties, but not in his personal life. Although the members who make up a political party are allowed to follow their faith, the essence of the organization's operations must be secular. Most individuals are unaware of this.

Secularism, as a constitutional ideal, is, nevertheless, consistently violated by the political and administrative establishments, both in letter and in spirit. A secular government cannot use its policies and programs to favor or disparage any religion. However, we see that governments, both at the federal level and at the state level, flagrantly break this cardinal rule by enacting religiously-specific social assistance programs that favor certain people while excluding others. Other fundamental protections, such equality and the prohibition of discrimination based on race, religion, or other factors, are also infringed as a result. This flagrant constitutional breach is not questioned or opposed.

The canvassing of votes in the name of religion is expressly prohibited. This is what the law says:

<em>"Section 123(3) of the Act* prohibits canvassing by an electoral candidate to woo voters in the name of race, caste, religion, community and language. It also prohibits usage of religious symbols or national symbols or flag for canvassing purposes. Usage of the aforesaid are considered to be corrupt practices. The electoral candidates cannot promise any public policy which they propose to implement on being successful."</em>

<em />

[*The 'Act' refers to the Representation of the People Act 1951]

Despite the fact that this is the law, the reality during election season is the complete reverse. Why doesn't anyone challenge it? Why doesn't anyone care about it? Every day we chant hymns to secularism, yet when it comes to actual practice, we disrespect it in spirit and soul. That is the major flaw in our democratic system.

Secularism itself is not the bad guy; its improper use is.

Thank you,

Eddie

5 0
1 year ago
Read 2 more answers
What methods were used by civil rights activists to bring attention to their cause?
Alja [10]
Many things including protests
5 0
3 years ago
How were Enlightenment philosophers influenced by ancient Greeks and Romans?
vazorg [7]

Answer: A

Explanation:

Because it makes the most sense

hope this helps!

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Which group is a national charity? United Way Freedom Corps church food pantry Neighborhood Watch
    9·1 answer
  • What did thomas more say about human nature
    11·1 answer
  • What does martin luther king mean by “I want to be the white mans brother not his brother in law.” ?
    11·2 answers
  • In contrast with traditional sharmanism neosharmanism focuses on the individual often as self help means of improving ones life
    6·1 answer
  • WORTH 50 Points!!!! I want answers, not just something to get the points!
    12·2 answers
  • Two groups of boys, one working class and the other middle class, engage in equal amounts of delinquent activities. One group is
    9·1 answer
  • Andres made an appointment to meet with a representative from his district. He wants to request funding on behalf of a local par
    9·1 answer
  • Why do you think kindness matters
    14·2 answers
  • The tendency of antianxiety drugs to be addictive has caused some psychiatrists to begin treating anxiety disorders with _______
    10·1 answer
  • Historically what kind of relationship has the press had with the government?
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!