Answer:
rates in the U.S. dropped to their lowest level since comprehensive records began in 1958
Anyone able to pay the transportation costs of the worker who was hired could use the Headrights system.
<h3>What does this system guarantee?</h3>
- Guarantee the domain of land.
- Guarantee the freedom to use the land.
Headrights was a system that promoted people who could pay for their workers' transport during working hours. In this way, the worker was able to optimize his money because he did not have to pay for transport.
The employer also had advantages, as this allowed him to receive land from the government.
50 acres were offered to employers in other regions and 100 acres to those already residing in the region.
Learn more about Headrights:
brainly.com/question/13481206
#SPJ1
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
During the times of NAFTA, the North America Free Trade Agreement between México, Canada, and the United States, many people opposed the treaty and questioned President Bill Clinton about it.
Nader and Buchanan opposed the ratification of NAFTA. This influenced what Clinton said in his speech of September 14, 1993. On that day, President Clinton signed two supplements that were included in the Free Trade Agreement.
President Clinton’s speech addressed the arguments against NAFTA that Nader and Buchanan made in that hehe said it was not true that the trade meant just moving out jobs from the US to México. And he clearly explained that Mexicans with lower income than Germans or Europeans spent more in US products, more than those Europeans and Canadians.
The correct answer is C eliminate unfair business practices.
The Interstate Commerce Act was created in 1887 to tackle railroad monopolies. It set guidelines on how the railroad companies could do business. The act became a law which demanded "just and reasonable" rates; prohibited special rates for individual shippers; prohibited favoritism in rates for shippers, or products; prohibited pooling of traffic and established an Interstate Commerce Commission.
Answer: What inference can you draw from why the First Continental Congress cut off trade with Britain and Ireland? Colonial leaders thought a boycott against British trade would be effective. The colonists had realized that they might have to fight British soldiers.
Explanation: Hope it helps :)
