That kind of fallacy is called Argumentum ad Hominem. It means the argument is addressed to the person; attacking that person instead the issue. There is an irrelevance because the argument is against to the person making a claim, rather against to the claim itself. An example is judging a person's social status or attitude, like calling his strategies aren't effective to finish a certain task because of his untidiness and laziness.
When Brenda apologizes to dharma for upsetting him with an e-mail and responds further, she is expressing a considerate behavior in this scenario.
<h3>What is considerate behavior?</h3>
The way of communication which involves being open and supportive about communication over any topic as such is known as a considerate behavior.
Furthermore, in considerate behavior, the ideas of other person are given respect and an expression of concern regarding the feelings of such person is also implied.
In the above example, Brenda is seen apologizing for her upsetting e-mail to dharma, which shows her concern for his feelings and with her expression of discussing further, she is showing a considerate behavior.
Hence, it can be stated that Brenda is expressing a form of considerate behavior in the scenario where one of her e-mails she wrote to dharma has upset him.
Learn more about considerate behavior here:
brainly.com/question/1843693
#SPJ1
Answer:
C. American Indians became hardier and fought off Spanish rule.
Explanation:
A. is not the correct answer. Spanish did not feel exhausted as they could easily replace the armies or continue after the break from the mission.
B. is not correct. Foreign parties did not raid the Spanish during their missions.
<u>C. is the correct answer. While Spanish armies had the weapons and means of the fighting the natives did not, American Indians started to learn new techniques and became more skilled in the fight against the Spains and their rulership.</u>
D. is not the right answer. Spain continued to support missions through its duration.
