<span>There's not really any pros for propaganda because essentially what you are doing is lying to get someone to believe something. I guess you could say a pro is that gullible people will believe you, but that's an unethical pro. The cons are that it usually causes much controversy in a society where there's not supposed to be a bias in the government. Propaganda in its true form is never a good thing. It is unethical in the sense that it takes advantage of people who are too lazy to do research and quick to believe what someone tells them. One example I like to use is many of these independent "news" websites. On both ends of the political spectrum, left and right, you find websites that have articles so heavily weighed down with that wings propaganda that true news becomes less and less visible. Occupy Democrats is one textbook example of that. Their articles are so left leaning that you read an article and are immediately left with a left leaning impression. Same goes for a lot of right wing websites. I'm not going to say "always" but propaganda 99.9 percent of the time is not good. Instead of people doing their own research to decide their view on something, propaganda </span>tells<span> people what they should think versus the </span><span>asking </span><span>people what they think</span>
Answer:
Proteins embedded within the phospholipid bilayer carry out the specific functions of the plasma membrane, including selective transport of molecules and cell-cell recognition.
The nurse define and document this finding would be 1+ edema perceptible swelling of the leg. Thus, the option (d) is correct.
What is swelling?
The terms swelling describes the body part's abnormality. An accumulation of fluid is what causes swelling in the body. Edema is a condition where the tissues around a joint expand, most commonly on the ankle or knee.
The edema accumulates, fluid can build up. On the leg, the nurse would press the skin's surface with their thumbs. It had an extremely smooth surface. No observable swelling of the limb, edema 1+, modest pitting, and slight indentation.
As a result, the nurse edema 1+ no perceptible swelling of the leg. Therefore, the option (d) is correct.
Learn more about on swelling, here:
brainly.com/question/7328644
#SPJ4
Your question is incomplete, but most probably the full question was.
a. 3+ edema
b. 4+ edema
c. 2+ edema
d. 1+ edema
That statement is False.
If the researcher is using random sampling, All subjects that chosen for the study had equal responsibility of being chosen
When the researcher determines that the amount of female and male subjects, must be the same, the research no longer has the equal opportunity for all the test subjects to be chosen.
Anselm argued that an ideal being is important to exist. during this argument God is an excellent being thus he should exist that is understood because of the ontological argument. Guanilo thought this argument was absurd and he viewed the other. one thing doesn't exist simply because it's excellent and he used the instance of an ideal island. The island is ideal thus in step with Anselm's view it ought to exist however the island stop to exist thus Guanilo planned this argument to be reductio ad absurdum. as compared they each agree that as a result, of one thing is ideal it doesn't exist however in distinction saint believed that God was an exception to the present because God is a whole totally different matter and Gaunilo doesn't believe God is an exception to the present view, though he Guanilo believes in God he doesn't consider the ontological argument as proof of Gods existence.
