The United States has a federal system of government, which means that laws are created at the federal and state level. This allows for flexibility and creativity in policy development because a state can create a law that is different from that at the federal level. Often, these laws can be used as templates to introduce legislation in other states, encouraging innovation.
One example is that of marijuana restrictions. The use and possession of cannabis is illegal under federal law for all purposes, even medicinal, because of the Controlled Substances Act of 1970. However, the law at state level varies greatly. Its medical use is allowed in 31 states, its recreational use in nine (Alaska, California, Colorado, Maine, Massachusetts, Nevada, Oregon, Vermont and Washington), and it is decriminalized in 13 states. The experiments with policy in some states have led to changes in other states, like in the case of California, which was the first state to legalize medical usage in 1996.
Answer:
B. Leaders of European and African countries worked together to partition Africa.
Explanation:
The Berlin Conference of 1884–85 was a meeting between European nations to create rules on how to peacefully divide Africa among them for colonization. The conference was convened by Portugal but led by Otto von Bismarck, chancellor of the newly united Germany. Though invited, the U.S. declined to participate
The correct answer is He found that emotions can be a conditioned response.
Tolman was influenced by the theoretical and experimental legacy of Thorndike, Watson and Gestalt psychologists. Whereas, in philosophical terms, he started his career under the aegis of Perry and Holt's neorealism (Lopes, 2008). These multiple influences, combined with the diversity, evolution and longevity of his work, make it difficult to classify his system based on broad labels such as behaviorism or cognitiveness (Santana & Borba, 2015).
In his first presentation of his explanatory system, Tolman (1922) addresses the problem of proposing an explanation that reconciles the need for an observable and measurable phenomenon like behavior - as opposed to introspectionist psychology - with a theory that encompasses behavioral functions not reducible to physiology , but that address the relationships between organism and environment capable of generating a “transformation factor” (Tolman, 1922), or that understand the behavior of each organism from its motivations and effects in a context.
If I’m not wrong I think is b or A because that happen in 2018 go for A.
