Answer:
The correct answer is A. maker.
Explanation:
The manufacturing industry (manufacturing) is the production of added value of merchandise for use or sale using labor and machinery, tools, chemical and biological processes, or formulation. The term can refer to a wide range of human activities, from handicraft to high technology, but it is more commonly applied to industrial production, in which raw materials are transformed into finished products on a large scale. Such finished products can be used to manufacture other more complex products, such as airplanes, appliances or cars, or be sold to wholesalers, which in turn sell them to retailers, which they then sell to end users or consumers.
Answer:
Check the following explanation
Explanation:
a) Usually a contract has the following elements:
Offer
.
Acceptance
.
Consideration
.
Intention to create a legal relationship
.
In the given case, the intention to create a legal relationship is missing. Though Study had sent a written legal contract to Burrow to affirm the contract, Burrow did not show any interest regarding the same. Hence Burrow can’t be sued for breach of contracts. Moreover the confirmation letter sent by Study does not qualify under the Merchant Memo Rule as the involved parties are not merchants. Burrow can use the terms of UCC for his favour. The UCC states that any contract with value more than $500 must be in writing. As the involved amount in this case is $1300, hence this case does not qualify as a contract under UCC.
b) If Study and Burrow were merchants, then the Merchant Memo Rule gets applicable. Then in that case, if 2 merchants enter into an oral contract, which is worth $500 or more and one of the merchant sends a written confirmation for the same, then a contract will be considered enforceable. In such a case, Burrow will be held liable for breach of contract and can be sued by Study.
Answer: Yes
Explanation: In the above case, a quasi-contract was formed. This is when a bilateral contract is not in place but one party will enjoy the benefit of the activities of the other party and may be enriched by it.
A bilateral agreement is the exchange of a promise for another and in this case would have been, the promise that Dozier would pay for Paschall’s work. This was not established, however, Dozier will benefit from Paschall’s work unduly if he does not pay for the improvements. The law holds that he has to pay for Paschall’s work to prevent being unjustly enriched.
Answer:
1.60 percent
Explanation:
exact real rate of return on this investment = interest rate - inflation rate
total revenue gotten by Christina = ( 500 × $ 64.25) + $ 738 = $ 32863
total money invested = 500 × $ 62.30 = $ 31150
her profit = $ 32863 - $ 31150 = $ 1713
interest = $ 1713 / $ 31150 = 0.054992 × 100 = 5.4992 %
exact interest rate = 5.4992 % - 3.9% = 1.5992 approx 1.60 percent
Answer:
The selling group member earns $12 on that sale
Explanation:
When selling a bond directly to the public, a group member earns a total takedown which is the total of the additional takedown plus the selling concession.
$12 + $15
= $27
Now if a selling group member finds a customer, then $15 which is the selling concession is given up leaving the member to earn $12 (the additional takedown) on that sale.