1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
NeTakaya
2 years ago
8

8 factors that influence your future

English
1 answer:
Ira Lisetskai [31]2 years ago
6 0

Answer:

Explanation:

Trust

Risk

Network

Patience

Optimist

Completion

Records  

You might be interested in
If a speaker wanted to support her claim that the class trip should be to Washington, D.C., instead of New York City, which of t
Eduardwww [97]

She should persuade her audience by including benefits of the trip to Washington D.C, historical facts, and locations. Also, New York can be used to compare to Washington D.C, so there is more opportunity to persuade the audience in going to D.C. I hope this makes sense, i may just me terrible about explaining, but i hope i kinda helped

6 0
3 years ago
Identify the simple predicate in the following sentence.
Troyanec [42]
"Has been waiting" should be your answer. a simple predicate is the verb or verb phrase in the sentence and it usually tells what the subject does. 
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Quindlen begins by disagreeing with a fellow writer. How and how fairly does she represent the opposing point of view?
Oksi-84 [34.3K]

Answer:Quindlen was criticizing the application of standardized testing (perhaps in the wake of the controversial "No Child Left Behind" act which some say placed too much emphasis on standardized testing). Quindlen's argument is that if standardized testing is to be used, it should at least be interesting and more importantly, such testing should not edit works of literature to the point at which significant meaning is lost. Actually, she is arguing that literature should not be edited at all.  

Quindlen doesn't think children are too feeble and weak to read controversial issues because they are exposed to such issues through the media and Internet every day. In fact, by sanitizing (editing out anything remotely controversial) literature, the test will not challenge the student.  

Those who design the test claim that anything controversial might distract the student and affect his/her performance. Quindlen's response is that the kids can handle it and more to the point, if all remotely controversial issues are edited out, what is left can hardly been interesting or engaging. Also, to edit in this way is historically irresponsible. Quindlen notes that in Isaac Singer's excerpt about being a young Jew in prewar (World War II) Poland, all references to Jews and Poles were taken out.  

Quindlen notes that there are other consequences of this editing. One is that the students will determine from this that those designing the test have no faith in their (the students') ability to handle differing perspectives and challenging intellectual material. Quindlen argues that this is sending the message to children that "we don't think you're smart enough."  

But what do the kids learn from this? That the written word doesn't really matter much, that it can be weakened at will. That no one trusts a student to understand that variations in opinion and background are both objectively interesting and intellectually challenging.  

This also tells the student that there is no power to the written word (as literature, laws, etc.) if we can simply edit things that don't appeal to a particular way of thinking. So, clearly Quindlen is against this manipulation of literature, in these tests and in general, for a number of reasons, all logical. This kind of editing also sets a dangerous precedent where those in power of educating children have the ability to subject students to a particular worldview that they only assume is the best for everyone. This is quite audacious and ignores one of the hallmarks of American culture: diversity.

Explanation:

hope you get your thing correct

4 0
3 years ago
Why are the logan kids, particularly cassie, behaving differently lately?
morpeh [17]
Cassie and they kids are behaving different because they are going to cut down the woods behind their house.
4 0
3 years ago
Acting on impulse, he reaches for the falling object, loses his balance, and falls into the dark water below. After this, Rainsf
mr Goodwill [35]

Answer:

The answer is 3.

Explanation:

Looking at the events that take place in the text given in the question, adding more information and details about Rainsford's past such as his military and hunting background that fits the part is the best option among the ones we are given to expand the ideas in the excerpt. The other options just provide details or ideas about the current events taking place and do not provide more depth to the story or the character.

I hope this answer helps.

5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Read the excerpt from "Let bindi have the limelight." in Australia, spring begins in september, so for the irwins, the new seaso
    9·2 answers
  • Does restricting guns disproportionately affect black lives?
    9·1 answer
  • In Journey to the Center of the Earth Chapters 19-21
    15·2 answers
  • What happened to Japaese Americans during World War II?
    11·2 answers
  • Which sentence has an adjectival phrase?
    8·1 answer
  • Think of a better and more effective idea to dispose garbage. Write a report.​
    13·1 answer
  • 100 points PLEASE HELP Read the excerpt from "On Beholding the Mountain."
    9·2 answers
  • Hannah dropped her bottle of water _____ the floor.<br> - in front of <br> -by<br> -on<br> -next to
    7·2 answers
  • I need it know<br>plsss​
    5·2 answers
  • Please select the answer that correctly fills the gap.
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!