Answer:
Yes it is
Explanation:
It is very important to monitor your employee, his growth and performance and contribution to the system of the company, and more importantly, his habit and is relationship with other in the office, his he a bad egg in the system ? So all this can be done without the consent to avoid the employee faking his behaviour ,this will help you to understand the person and see his flawless easily. So yes it is ethical.
Answer:
Confirmation
Explanation:
In scenarios whereby an individual gives more credence to the his or her existing belief while failing to give consideration to happenings or possibilities which may say otherwise. We might see this a an act of being rigid on a certain piece of information or belief to the extent than one dispels all possible scenarios which may prove the otherwise to the belief. In the scenario above, Carmellas existing belief thatbtge inability to deliver at work is only based in incompetence of the worker while filing to examine the possibility whereby the tasks being dished out to the worker might be difficult.
Answer:
Thank you for the free points!
Explanation:
Answer:
C
Explanation:
wikipedia says: "The Connecticut Compromise (also known as the Great Compromise of 1787 or Sherman Compromise) was an agreement that large and small states reached during the Constitutional Convention of 1787 that in part defined the legislative structure and representation that each state would have under the United States Constitution. It retained the bicameral legislature as proposed by Roger Sherman, along with proportional representation of the states in the lower house or House of Representatives, but required the upper house or Senate to be weighted equally among the states. Each state would have two representatives in the upper house."
