Answer:
Yes. Southam's research was "more wrong"
Explanation:
They both didn't seek the informed consent of their patients and we're both wrong. However, Southam injected patients(both healthy and unhealthy) with cancerous cells to see how their bodies would react. This was terribly wrong seeing that he put unsuspecting patients in danger. Elsie on the other hand, collected tissue samples from his patients to conduct his research which is a clear violation of their rights but clearly not as deadly as Southam's.
I believe the answer is: <span>enough statistical support for the research hypothesis when there is not
In statistic terms, a type I error refers to the occurrence of "false positive" findings.
A false positive often happen when we do not have enough subjects which make us believe the data that we took from a small sample represent the true condition outside the research.</span><span />
A group of people who share a similar experience common to all of its members is called a generation.
More about generation:
A generation is the collective term for all individuals who were born and are still alive at around the same period having same experiences. The average time frame, commonly regarded to be between 20 and 30 years, during which children are born, grow up, become adults, and start having children is another way to put it.
In social science, the terms "generation" and "cohort" are sometimes used interchangeably to refer to "individuals within a defined population who experience the same key events over a certain period of time."
These birth cohorts, usually referred to as "social generations," are frequently employed in popular culture and have served as the foundation for sociological study.
Learn more about experience here:
brainly.com/question/14981159
#SPJ4
A person is innocent unless proven guilty in a court of law.
