It is morally impermissible to treat people differently unless there are factual differences between them.
Factual differences. The possibility that the facts with respect to which this Agreement is entered into may differ from the facts that each Party currently knows or believes to be true is recognized and accepted by each of the Parties. The Parties concur that any such discrepancies in reality will not cause the termination or revocation of this Agreement, which shall remain in full force and effect.
If there is a disagreement regarding the interpretation, application, operation, or any alleged violation of the Agreement between the Employer and any employee(s), or between the Employer and the Union, the employee(s) shall continue to work in accordance with the Agreement until the disagreement is resolved.
Learn more about Factual differences here
brainly.com/question/21864490
#SPJ4
I believe the answer is: psychological meaning
Psychological meaning refers to the meaning that perceived through the speaker's mind, emotion, or intention. Psychological meaning of a certain statement would be different depending on the context of the statement or the body language that the speaker display when saying it.
When businesses and other organizations develop international influence, there is an exchange of cultural values. For example, Americanization. Through globalization, the US was able to share its products overseas, thus spread American pop culture. (Think Coca-Cola etc.) I hope this helps!
Answer:
What best explains this is:
2. mere presence hypothesis.
Explanation:
The mere presence hypothesis serves to explain social facilitation. According to it, <u>some people tend to be more aware of evaluation when in the mere presence of others. For that reason, they tend to perform better on tasks that are simple or well-rehearsed</u>. For instance, an athlete such as a weightlifter may lift heavier weights in the presence of others than if he were by himself. <u>On the other hand, those same people tend to perform worse in the presence of others when the task is complex or new. </u>
<u>Notice that this seems to be the case with the magician we are analyzing. She performed better in the presence of an audience, but only when it came to the simpler tricks. When it came to her grand finale, she failed. Her big finale certainly had more complexity than the other tricks. Her performance is, therefore, explained by the mere presence hypothesis.</u>