Answer:
universal
Explanation:
Based on the information provided within the question in regards to the situation it seems that Deepak belief reflects a universal perspective. This is a perspective in which the individual believes that a specific something will work/fit into every similar situation. Such as is the case in this scenario since he believes that his methodology will work for any organization regardless of different factor variations.
Fee-for-service (FFS) is health care's most traditional payment model where physicians and healthcare providers are paid by government agencies and insurance companies (third-party payers), or individuals, based on the number of services provided, or the number of procedures ordered.
When the movement is modified it indicates that a habit or behavior is continually or regularly done. This type of action is called temporal aspect in ASL.
According to this aspect of ASL, the movement of the predicate, or in simple terms, the verb, can be changed usually by repeating the movement. Once facial expressions contribute to the apt representation of the sign, adding more meaning to it and helping convey attitude and intention, specifically.
The verb inflection of duration has elliptical, long and repeated movements while the verb inflection of frequency has straight movement of verbs. Having said that, it is important to note that not all verbs can be modulated to temporal aspects in ASL.
To learn more about ASL, click
brainly.com/question/23513069
#SPJ4
Where are the following choices?
I think the prime reason why a government would be unstable is when the government's actions and powers do not match with the needs of the populace. Those needs can be many different things and can be different things at different times: food, shelter, infrastructure, protection from bad neighbors, protection from invaders... the list would take me a day and a half.
If you look back at the collapse of the USSR, there was a misalignment between the people's needs and what the government gave. If you look at the current USA, the least stable places are where government is deliberately creating friction with the citizens, and close to that are the places where government is not creating a good framework for people's needs to be met.
Corruption can be a symptom of this mismatch, but in and of itself is not the prime reason for instability. Go look at various nation-states throughout history. The unstable governments were and are the ones where a large segment of people felt the government wasn't doing anything to help them with their needs.