All categories

2 years ago

social networkers are composed of people who are similar in terms of ethnicity, religion, age, and country of origin.

Social Studies

1 answer:

pashok25 [27]2 years ago

5 0

<u>True.</u> People who use social networks tend to share similar racial, religious, age, and national origins.

<h3><u>What is ethnicity?</u></h3>

The shared characteristics of a group, such as culture, religion, language, nationality, common ancestry, and more, are essentially linked to ethnicity. It is the physical manifestation of a past shared by several cultures, which gave rise to comparable worldviews, goals, and values.

Ethnicity serves as a source of meaning and purpose for a large portion of the global population. People accept their ethnic identification based on their participation in the traditions of the group they belong to as well as their membership in the group as a whole, which appears to be primarily characterized by a shared religion and a language.

Learn more about ethnicity with the help of the given link:

brainly.com/question/26273889

#SPJ4

You might be interested in

Why did the electoral college cease to function as the Framers has intended?

pshichka [43]

the rise of political parties

5 0

4 years ago

hat is the MAIN difference between Sunni and Shia Muslims? A) The Sunni believe in the idea of Monotheism. B) The Shia pray towa

skad [1K]

I think the answer is c

6 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

In a criminal or public case,In a criminal or public case, if you have enough information to support a search warrant, the prose

lisabon 2012 [21]

Answer:

Affidavit (assuming the exercise has the same question twice).

Explanation:

As the exercise suggests, an affidavit is a sworn statement, made under oath, before the appropiate magistrate or officer. In other words, is a some kind of authorization for certain processes. In this case, the prosecuting attorney is asking for an affidavit in order to support the search warrant.

7 0

3 years ago

green forest are nepal wealth "(hariyo ban, nepalko dhan .)explain this statement in an editoral for the english magazine

masha68 [24]

Answer:

hope this what u want

hope it helps

3 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

No theocracies are true democracies. no secular government are theocracies. Thus, some secular government are true democracies.

zhenek [66]

Answer:

No theocracies are true democracies. no secular government are theocracies. Thus, some secular government are true democracies.

d. deductive invalid

Explanation:

The given statement is deductive as well as invalid.
Such a process of logic in which we use the logic of two or more statements to get a final logical conclusion is known as deductive logic.
In the given situation, we have concluded that some secular governments are true democracies on the basis of no theocracies are true democracies and no secular government are theocracies.
So although, it is deductive logic but it is invalid as well.

3 0

4 years ago