Answer:
A force exists that we knew nothing about that causes the acceleration.
Explanation:
In 1998, scientists observed from distances of supernovae in remote galaxies that the enlargement of the universe is accelerating. Besides, there is evidence that suggests that the universe is flat and infinite, as well as accelerating in its expansion. In that respect, the force suspected to be responsible for this is called dark energy.
I need me some brainlyest so here you go.
Pros:
More exercise than driving a car places.
Creates less pollution.
You can enjoy the outdoors with a bike.
Saves money that a car and gas cost.
Less likely to get stuck in traffic with a bike.
Cons:
The exercise can make you sweaty and smelly.
Has no storage to hold things.
More likely to break or need maintenance.
You are exposed to rain or bad weather.
Harder to see in the dark while riding a bike.
:)
Humans affect the water cycle in numerous ways. Some of our actions purposefully affect the water cycle and other human activities have unintentional consequences on the water cycle.We pull water out of the ground in order to use it. We change the flow of water using irrigation. We dam lakes and rivers for electricity and to create manmade lakes and ponds. The Colorado River in the US no longer reaches the ocean at times because humans have altered it so much.Climate change is causing numerous changes to the water cycle. Sea levels are rising in some areas and dropping in others, glaciers are retreating and disappearing affecting rivers, droughts are happening more frequently in some regions and floods in other areas, coastlines are changing and some islands are disappearing, the polar ice cap is melting, and so forth.
The use of pesticides, herbicides, and excess nitrogen for farming runs off into rivers and streams and pollutes groundwater. Deforestation, whether for timber or to clear land for agriculture or development, increases runoff. Certain emissions from industry cause acid rain .
In Gideon v. Wainwright, the Supreme Court overturned their previous ruling in Betts v. Brady that states were not required to provide counsel-(c) <u>The Sixth Constitutional amendment</u> was interpreted in both of these case
Explanation:
- The sixth Amendment states that the right of counsel is the fundamental right for a free trial
- <u>As per the sixth Amendment in the Gideon v. Wainwright,Gideon applead to the court to provide a legal lawyer as he was too poor to pay the fee of the lawyer .So the Sixth amendment was passed,which guarantees the right of counsel is the fundamental right for a free trial.</u>
- <u>But in the Betts v. Brady case the Court overruled the the sixth Amendment act which which guarantees the right of counsel is the fundamental right for a free trial.</u>
<u></u>
So , in Gideon v. Wainwright, the Supreme Court overturned their previous ruling in Betts v. Brady that states were not required to provide counsel-(c) <u>The Sixth Constitutional amendment</u> was interpreted in both of these case
