All categories

1 year ago

Competitive price taker firms always earn zero economic profit in long run equilibrium because:_______

1 answer:

3 0

Competitive price taker firms always earn zero economic profit in long-run equilibrium because of the following reasons which include easy entry & exit, small player etc.

Perfect competition exists when there are many sellers, firms can easily enter and exit, products are identical from one seller to the next, and sellers are price takers.

A perfectly competitive firm must accept the equilibrium price at which it sells goods because it is a price taker.

A perfectly competitive firm will be unable to make any sales if it charges even a small amount more than the market price.

Furthermore, a perfectly competitive firm must be a very small player in the overall market, allowing it to increase or decrease output without affecting the overall quantity supplied and price in the market.

Hence, Competitive price taker firms always earn zero economic profit in long-run equilibrium.

Learn more about Long-run equilibrium:

brainly.com/question/6275304

#SPJ4

You might be interested in

Suppose that lenders want to receive a real rate of interest of 5 percent and that they expect inflation to remain steady at 2 p

Helga [31]

Answer:

Explanation:

nominal interest rate = real interest rate + expected inflation rate

nominal interest rate = 5% + 2% = 7%

Usually the nominal interest rate has four major components:

real interest rate: the net interest rate received by a lender or an investor
inflation rate: the general rise in the prices of goods and services, as inflation increases, the purchasing power of a currency decreases
liquidity risk premium: usually collateralized loans include a liquidity risk premium since not all assets can be easily converted to cash.
credit risk: possibility of the borrower defaulting the loan

7 0

2 years ago

Pat Jones is a college student who is planning some networking opportunities for the current l semester. Pat wanted to look

DaniilM [7]

Answer:

1. I feel like Pat's new strategy isn't ethical. Pat doesn't pay for the suits; he just buys them and then returns them. Pat benefits, but the store he gets the suits from doesn't. In fact, they are harmed from this transaction because they are unable to have the suit for others to buy while Pat has it. There could be consequences with this strategy. For example, the suit might be damaged, and Pat won't be able to return it. Another problem is that others might find out about Pat's strategy, and they might view them as unprofessional. This is a problem for Pat since the reason Pat wore those suits was to look professional.

2. The stores are harmed from this transaction. They are unable to sell the suits to other buyers. The stores lose potential customers, so the stores lose potential money.

3. The companies should record that Pat had bought the suit only to return it the next day, so that they can act accordingly when Pat or someone else comes back to "buy" a suit.

Explanation:

7 0

2 years ago

Consider an industry in which chief executive ocers (CEOs) run rms. There are two types of CEOs: exceptinal and average. There i

klemol [59]

Answer

The answer and procedures of the exercise are attached in the following 3 images.

Explanation

Please consider the data provided by the exercise. If you have any question please write me back. All the exercises are solved in 3 sheets with the formulas indications.

8 0

3 years ago

Next week, super discount airlines has a flight from new york to los angeles that will be booked to capacity. the airline knows

Setler79 [48]

The cost of underestimating the demand is considered a revenue loss that arises due to cancellation of flight costing $134. Hence, cost of underetimating the demand is $C_u=\$134$ .

The cost of overestimating the demand is known as rewards. For example, free round trip ticket worth $263. Hence, the cost of overestimating the demand is $C_o=\$263$ .

$\frac{C_u}{C_u+C_o} = \frac{134}{134+263} \\ \\ = \frac{134}{397} =0.3375$

The z-score that yields a p-value of 0.3375 is -0.4193.

Thus, super discount airlines should overbook the flight by 35 + (-0.4193 x 24) = 35 - 10.0632 = 24.9368 = 25 seats.

Therefore, super discount airlines should overbook the flight by 25 seats.

4 0

3 years ago

Let's say there's a company that can fully tax deduct the interest on its loans. If this company borrows more, then the discount

umka21 [38]

Answer:

High

Low

Explanation:

When a company borrows funds it has opportunity to avail tax shield on the interest amount of the borrowing fund. If the company borrows more fund then the discounted value of tax shield will increase while the financial distress cost will decrease.

5 0

3 years ago