Answer: You should not make that assumption in this problem.
The side-splitter theorem is about the line segments that are formed on the transverals themselves. It is not talking about the distances on the set of parallel lines. If you wanted to find the value of x, you should look for another way to prove the relationship involving the x-value.
Answer:
D
Step-by-step explanation:
Find out if they match in all of them
Hope this helps
Answer: Choice C
Amy is correct because a nonlinear association could increase along the whole data set, while being steeper in some parts than others. The scatterplot could be linear or nonlinear.
======================================================
Explanation:
Just because the data points trend upward (as you go from left to right), it does not mean the data is linearly associated.
Consider a parabola that goes uphill, or an exponential curve that does the same. Both are nonlinear. If we have points close to or on these nonlinear curves, then we consider the scatterplot to have nonlinear association.
Also, you could have points randomly scattered about that don't fit either of those two functions, or any elementary math function your teacher has discussed so far, and yet the points could trend upward. If the points are not close to the same straight line, then we don't have linear association.
-----------------
In short, if the points all fall on the same line or close to it, then we have linear association. Otherwise, we have nonlinear association of some kind.
Joseph's claim that an increasing trend is not enough evidence to conclude the scatterplot is linear or not.
Answer: This is what I think the answers are....
Hopefully this helps
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
The missing number is 20
Step-by-step explanation:
Given function: f(x) = 1/2x + 10
Rewrite: y = 1/2x + 10
Flip x and y: x = 1/2y + 10
x - 10 = 1/2y
2(x-10) = y
2x - 20 = y
y = 2x - 20
h(x) = 2x - 20
