It is true that the affluence that is beneficial for people and society may also be negative for health, which is a contradiction in health programmer planning. Everything in the world, as we all know, has both good and bad sides.
The same forces that led to the problems that planning is meant to solve also shape it. The affluence that comes with health and wellbeing is "good" for people and society, but it is "bad" to the extent that it also leads to ill health.
What is simpler and more efficient could also be less acceptable. The planning of health initiatives should ideally be started by those in need, but this rarely happens; instead, health professionals take the lead.
In contrast to health planners, politicians typically favor long-term, planned, and less noticeable initiatives. Planning is done with success in mind. Most planning is done to bring about change rather than to establish stability.
Additionally, we might assert that health programmers serve just to increase public awareness. The proper diet plan must be followed for healthy habits which will lead to a healthy life.
To know more about paradox issues go to brainly.com/question/20213068
#SPJ4
