1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Dima020 [189]
2 years ago
11

(01.02 mc) which of these actions was an economic cause of increased tensions between the north and south?

Business
1 answer:
Damm [24]2 years ago
6 0

The correct option is (b) Protective tariffs

Protective tariffs aim to make imported goods more expensive while protecting domestic producers from overseas rivalry.

<h3 /><h3>What is protective tarrifs?</h3>
  • An illustration of a protective tariff would be the US raising the customs charge on clothing imported from Britain so that it is significantly more expensive than clothing made domestically.
  • The importing countries profit the most from tariffs since they design the policy and receive the cash.
  • The main advantage of tariffs is that they generate income from imported products and services. Tariffs may also serve as a springboard for negotiations between two countries.
  • Protective tariffs are designed to shield vital American industries from international competition, stop foreign manufacturers from dumping inexpensive goods in the US, or both.

Learn more about the Tarrifs with the help of the given link:

brainly.com/question/11672570

#SPJ4

I understand that the question you are looking for is "Which of these actions was an economic cause of increased tensions between the North and South?

(a) Dred Scott decision

(b) Protective tariffs

(c) Bleeding Kansas

(d) Lincoln’s election"

You might be interested in
Edmund would like to buy stock. What should he do?
Ket [755]
<span>He should choose a broker, open an account, deposit money, and communicate with the broker what stock he wants to buy.</span>
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What is designed to enlarge the market and economic basis of the countries involved​
AlekseyPX

Answer:

Economic integration

Economic integration is the unification of economic policies between different states, through the partial or full abolition of tariff and non-tariff restrictions on trade.

The trade-stimulation effects intended by means of economic integration are part of the contemporary economic Theory of the Second Best: where, in theory, the best option is free trade, with free competition and no trade barriers whatsoever. Free trade is treated as an idealistic option, and although realized within certain developed states, economic integration has been thought of as the "second best" option for global trade where barriers to full free trade exist.

Economic integration is meant in turn to lead to lower prices for distributors and consumers with the goal of increasing the level of welfare, while leading to an increase of economic productivity of the states.

4 0
3 years ago
With their flooring business now eight months old, Jesse and Ed readily admit that _______ has been both a pro and a con in thei
pychu [463]
With their flooring business now eight months old, Jesse and Ed readily admit that raising capital has been both a pro and a con in their partnership.
I think this is the correct answer because they will raise their capital and make sure that they will gain from it.
7 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Lambert Company acquired machinery costing $110,000 on January 2, 2016. At that time, Lambert estimated that the useful life of
bulgar [2K]

Answer:

Depreciation expense for               2016            2017             2018

Method: Straight-line                    $15,833      $15,833         $15,833

              Double-declining           $36,663     $24,443         $16,296

The revision of the estimates at the beginning of 2018 would lead to lower yearly depreciation expense.

Explanation:

(a) Under straight-line method, depreciation expense is (cost - residual value) / No of years = ($110,000 - $15,000) / 6 years = $15,833 yearly depreciation expense. This depreciation expense of $15,833 applies to Years 2016, 2017 and 2018. Accumulated depreciation for those years is $15,833 x 3 years $47,499.

(b) The double-declining method is otherwise known as the reducing balance method and is given by the formula below:

Double declining method = 2 X SLDP X BV

SLDP = straight-line depreciation percentage

BV = Book value

SLDP is 100%/6 years = 16.67%, then 16.67% multiplied by 2 to give 33.33%

At Year 2016, 33.33% X $110,000 = $36,663

At Year 2017, 33.33% X $73,337 ($110,000 - $36,663) = $24,443

At Year 2018, 33.33% X $48,894 ($73,337 - $24,443) = $16,296

Accumulated depreciation expense for Years 2016 to 2018, under this method, is $77,402 (addition of all the yearly depreciation).

(c) If after 2 years, the revised estimated useful life becomes 7 years and the residual value is $10,000, depreciation would be calculated as follows:

Under the straight-line method, NBV (net book value) at the end of 2017 is: $110,000 - $15,833 x 2 years = $78,334

Depreciation expense is: ($78,334 - $10,000) / 7 years = $9,762 (decrease in 2018 yearly depreciation charge)

Under the double-declining method, SLDP is 100%/7 years = 14.29%, then multiplied by 2 to give 28.57%.

At Year 2018, 28.57% X $48,894 ($73,337 - $24,443) = $13,969 (decrease in 2018 yearly depreciation charge)

6 0
3 years ago
Baxter International Inc. can obtain funds for future investments through retained earnings, new issues of common stock, and iss
CaHeK987 [17]

Answer:

The multiple choices are:

a. 7.72%  

b. 5.40%

c. 5.22%

d. 7.46%

e. 4.90%

Option B is the correct answer,5.40%

Explanation:

In order to determine the after tax cost of Baxter's debt,we need to first of all calculate the pretax cost of debt which is by applying the rate formula in excel.

=rate(nper,pmt,-pv,fv)

nper is the number of coupon payments the bond would make which is 30

pmt is the annual coupon interest on the bond=7%*$1000=$70

pv is the current price of the bond minus the flotation cost=$945*(1-3%)=$916.65

The fv is the face value of $1000 per bond

=rate(30,70,-916.65,1000)

pretax cost of debt=rate=7.72%

After tax cost of debt=pretax cost of debt*(1-t)

t is th tax rate of 30% 0or 0.30

after tax cost of debt=7.72%*(1-.3)=5.40%

7 0
4 years ago
Other questions:
  • What trend in wages paid to workers in america developed between 1860 and 1890?
    15·1 answer
  • Which of the following taxpayers may not be able to claim full benefits for some common itemized deductions?
    9·1 answer
  • "Which of the following is the reason behind the slow growth in U.S. incomes during the 1970s and 1980s a. unstable economic con
    5·2 answers
  • How has BRICs membership benefited South Africa so far?
    12·1 answer
  • Wilson Links Products sells a product that involves two separate performance obligations: the SwingRight golf club weight and th
    7·1 answer
  • 3. At what point do crime scene photographers enter the scene of the crime and why?
    12·1 answer
  • Xminus−Industries manufactures 3minus−D printers. For each​ unit, $ 3 comma 200$3,200 of direct material is used and there is $
    7·1 answer
  • The management of Ballard MicroBrew is considering the purchase of an automated bottling machine for $120,000. The machine would
    14·1 answer
  • In the classical model with fixed income, if the demand for goods and services is less than the supply, the interest rate will:
    13·2 answers
  • Murray Plc owns​ 60% of the equity share capital of Federer Ltd. For the year ended 31 December 20X6 Federer reported profit aft
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!