All categories

1 year ago

(01.02 mc) which of these actions was an economic cause of increased tensions between the north and south?

Business

1 answer:

Damm [24]1 year ago

6 0

The correct option is (b) Protective tariffs

Protective tariffs aim to make imported goods more expensive while protecting domestic producers from overseas rivalry.

<h3 /><h3>What is protective tarrifs?</h3>

An illustration of a protective tariff would be the US raising the customs charge on clothing imported from Britain so that it is significantly more expensive than clothing made domestically.
The importing countries profit the most from tariffs since they design the policy and receive the cash.
The main advantage of tariffs is that they generate income from imported products and services. Tariffs may also serve as a springboard for negotiations between two countries.
Protective tariffs are designed to shield vital American industries from international competition, stop foreign manufacturers from dumping inexpensive goods in the US, or both.

Learn more about the Tarrifs with the help of the given link:

brainly.com/question/11672570

#SPJ4

I understand that the question you are looking for is "Which of these actions was an economic cause of increased tensions between the North and South?

(a) Dred Scott decision

(b) Protective tariffs

(d) Lincoln’s election"

You might be interested in

A company estimates that an average-risk project has a WACC of 10 percent, a below-average-risk project has a WACC of 8 percent,

prisoha [69]

Answer:

B) Project B has below-average risk and an IRR = 8.5 percent.

Explanation:

Since the evaluation is based on IRR, use IRR rule that says you accept a project if its IRR > Cost of capital(WACC in this case)

Project A's IRR of 9% is < 10% WACC for average risk projects hence reject it.

Project B's IRR of 8.5% is > 8% WACC for below- average risk projects hence accept it.

Project C's IRR of 11% is < 12% WACC for above- average risk projects hence reject it.

8 0

3 years ago

Marigold Corp. purchased a truck at the beginning of 2020 for $109700. The truck is estimated to have a salvage value of $4200 a

jeka57 [31]

Answer:

the depreciation expense of the year 2020 is $18,870

Explanation:

The computation of the depreciation expense of the year 2020 is as follows:

= (Truck value - salvage value) ÷ (useful life) × (driven miles)

= ($109,700 - $4,200) ÷ (123,000 miles) × (22,000 miles)

= $18,870

Hence, the depreciation expense of the year 2020 is $18,870

6 0

3 years ago

Martha worked for a marketing company with a casual atmosphere and informal culture. The company declared bankruptcy. Martha can

Elis [28]

Answer: Practical intelligence

Explanation: In simple words, practical intelligence refers to the ability of an individual to shape and fit itself according to the demands of the environment.

In the given case, Martha worked with a company that had a casual and open atmosphere. But after joining employment in a bank she herself understood that different attitude will be needed there to work. She herself adjusted her personality and dressing as per the demand of the environment.

Hence from the above we can conclude that she is exhibiting practical intelligence.

7 0

3 years ago

On march 1, year 1, roland doe bought 200 shares of gummit stock at $40 per share. on april 1, year 2, roland sold short (sold w

laiz [17]

Answer:

1,000 long term capital gain

Explanation:

8 0

3 years ago

Montana Mining Co. pays $3,721,000 for an ore deposit containing 1,525,000 tons. The company installs machinery in the mine cost

Paraphin [41]

Answer:

Ore deposit depletion and Mining machinery depreciation Journal entries

Dr Depletion charge (Ore deposits) 405,528

Cr Accumulated depreciation 405,528

Dr Depletion charge (Ore deposits) 23,268

Cr Accumulated depreciation 23,268

Explanation:

Preparation of the year-end entries to record both the ore deposit depletion and the mining machinery depreciation of Montana Mining Co

Depletion of natural resources can be defined as the way in which the cost of natural resources is apportioned upto the period when it will be utilized which is why they are shown at cost in balance sheet.

The entry is to record depreciation charged on ore deposit depletion. Therefore To record this entry we have to debit depletion charges, and credit accumulated depreciation

Dr Depletion charge (Ore deposits) 405,528

Cr Accumulated depreciation 405,528

Computation of depletion cost per unit:

The depletion cost per unit can be calculated by dividing the net cost of the ore with the total units of capacity :

Depletion/units = Cost - Salvage/ Total unit of capacity

$3,721,000/1,525,000 tons

=$2.44

Hence, depletion per unit is $2.44.

Computation depletion amount on ore deposit:

The depletion amount on ore deposit can be calculated by multiplying the cost per depletion unit with the number of units utilized:

Depletion =Cost/Unit ×Units Utilized

$2.44×166,200 tones

=$405,528

Hence, depletion expenses on ore deposit amounts to $405,528.

The pass entry to record depreciation charged on mining machine :

Dr Depletion charge (Ore deposits) 23,268

Cr Accumulated depreciation 23,268

Computation of depreciation cost per unit:

The depletion cost per unit can be calculated by dividing the net cost of the ore with the total units of capacity :

Depletion/units = Cost - Salvage/ Total unit of capacity

$213,500/1,525,000 tons

=$0.14

Hence, depreciation per unit is $0.14.

Computation of depreciation amount on ore deposit:

The depletion amount on ore deposit can be calculated by multiplying the cost per depletion unit with the number of units utilized:

Depletion =Cost/Unit ×Units Utilized

$0.14×166,200 tones

=$23,268

Therefore the depreciation expenses on ore deposit amounts to $23,268

4 0

3 years ago