All categories

1 year ago

True or false: unlike the economic system of a country, the legal system is not influenced by the prevailing political system.

1 answer:

7 0

The statement is False. Unlike the economic system of a country, the legal system is not influenced by the prevailing political system.

Free market, command, and mixed economies are the three primary types. The chart that follows contrasts command and free-market economies; mixed economies combine the two. Both people and corporations are free to choose their own economic course.

A common law system has the advantage of allowing you to be certain of the outcome of your case if a similar case has already been heard. The disadvantage is that if you have a unique circumstance, a court might easily create a new law and apply it to your situation.

To learn more on economic system

brainly.com/question/27630988

#SPJ4

You might be interested in

According to the video, what do Security Guards commonly protect? Select all that apply.

dimaraw [331]

Answer: I think its C

Explanation: hey

8 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

1.4 The process of allocating a business function to a

ElenaW [278]

Outsourcing because a third party is someone who is not one of the main people involved in a business.

5 0

3 years ago

A man has $245,000 invested in three properties. One earns 12%, one 10% and one 8%. His annual income from the properties is $23

astraxan [27]

Answer:

for 8% investment = $110000

for 12% investment = $55000

for 10% investment = $80000

annual income for each property is

x amount for 8% investment = $8800

y amount for 12% investment = $6600

z amount for 10% investment = $8000

Explanation:

Given data

investment = $245000

rate 1 = 12%

rate 2 = 10%

rate 3 = 8%

annual income = $23400

rate = 8% twice that invested at 12%

to find out

invested in each property and the annual income from each property

solution

let us consider x amount for 8% investment

and consider y amount for 12% investment

and consider z amount for 10% investment

from question we say, 8% is twice that invested at 12%

x = 2y ........1

and

x + y + z = 245000 .............2

put 1 in equation 2

2y + y + z = 245000

z = 245000 - 3y ...................3

and we can say that

0.08x + 0.12y + 0.10z = 23400 ...........................4

put equation 1 and 3 in 4

0.08(2y) + 0.12y + 0.10( 245000 - 3y ) = 23400

0.16y + 0.12y - 0.3y = -1100

0.02y = 1100

y = $55000

so x = 2(y) = 2(5500) = $110000

and z = 245000 - 3(55000) = $80000

so annual income for each property is

x amount for 8% investment = 0.08 × 110000 = $8800

y amount for 12% investment = 0.12 × 55000 = $6600

z amount for 10% investment = 0.10 × 80000 = $8000

4 0

3 years ago

Amir is a computer engineer. he occasionally works for a lazlo inc., a publishing company; however, he only works for the organi

Shalnov [3]

amir would be classified as an on-call worker.

<h3>What is on-call worker?</h3>

An on-call employee (oproepkracht) works only when you, the employer, summon them. You and your employee have agreed on this. There are various forms of on-call contracts, each with its own set of rules.

An on-call schedule (or on-call shift) is a timetable that guarantees the appropriate person is always accessible, day or night, to respond rapidly to events and outages. On-call doctors in the medical field are expected to respond to medical crises at any moment during their shift.

On call is a vital duty among many IT, developer, support, and operations teams that provide services that customers demand to be available 24 hours a day, seven days a week. Team members rotate via an on-call cycle, providing coverage around the clock or solely during normal business hours.

To know more about on-call worker follow the link:

brainly.com/question/12831236

#SPJ4

5 0

1 year ago

A fixed asset with a five-year estimated useful life and no scrap value is sold at the end of the second year of its useful life

JulsSmile [24]

Answer:

B) A gain would be less or a loss would be greater using straight-line depreciation.

Explanation:

In straight line method of depreciation there is a fixed amount of depreciation, and in double declining method the rate is double of straight line method,

Let us take an example,

Cost of asset = $500,000

Selling price at end of 2nd year = $300,000

Straight line depreciation = $100,000 for each year i.e. $500,000/5

Double declining method rate = ($100,000/$500,000) $\times$ 100 $\times$ 2 = 40%

Therefore value at end of second year

Straight line = $500,000 - ($100,000 $\times$ 2 ) = $300,000

Double Declining method = ($500,000 -40%) - 40% = $180,000

In case of sale at $300,000

Profit shall be

Straight line = $300,000 - $300,000 = 0

Double Declining = $300,000 - $180,000 = $120,000

Now, there will be more profit in double declining that is gain is less in straight line and losses would be greater in straight line thus statement B is correct.

8 0

3 years ago