Answer:
a. Marbury v. Madison
Explanation:
The Marbury case v. Madison was responsible for allowing a court decision through a court. This case gave a lot of influence to the judiciary that was able to make judicial reviews through the courts, being able, then, to remove federal laws that do not correspond to the constitution and allowing the judges to reverse decisions previously taken, but that can no longer be considered.
Despite the widespread notion that Latino refers to any Spanish speaking person, Latino actually refers to people from Latin America - Mexicans, Brazilians, Bolivians, Cubans, etc. Many people think Latino and Hispanic are interchangeable, when they in fact are not. Someone who speaks Spanish is Hispanic, but not necessarily Latino, and vice versa. For example, Spanish people from Spain; they are Hispanic, but not Latino. Someone from Brazil is Latino, but not Hispanic. However, someone from Mexico is Hispanic and Latino.
I hope this helps.
Answer:
Streamline collaboration: Technology advancements such as Building Information Modeling (BIM) helps everybody involved in a project stay on the same page at every step. Engineers, designers, and architects can use a BIM program to ensure their specific plans are in alignment before any cutting or welding takes place.
Explanation:
Answer:
I my opinion they are very important
Explanation:
Because they need to inspire people to wear a mask because people arnt doing so.
Answer:
A.Relevant, but only if the crime that was committed involved the use of a blowtorch.
Explanation:
These are options for the question
A.Relevant, but only if the crime that was committed involved the use of a blowtorch.
B.Relevant, but only if the prosecution can prove that Charles Rogers and not his brother was the actual owner of the blowtorch.
C.Irrelevant, assuming the defendant can prove to the court in an offer of proof that his brother does in fact use the blowtorch for professional purposes.
D.Irrelevant, since it is not information that a person would want to know in deciding whether the defendant committed the crime.
From the question we are informed Charles Rogers who was accused of robbing a bank by breaking into the bank's vault after hours. The prosecution seeks to introduce evidence that a blowtorch was found in his garage. The defendant objects, pointing out that Rogers' brother, who shares the home with Rogers, is a professional pipe-fitter and uses the blowtorch every day for legitimate work. In this case The evidence is relevant, but only if the crime that was committed involved the use of a blowtorch. In a crime scene which is regarded as location that is been associated to the crime committed. In this scene physical evidence should be able to be provided so that investigation and persecution of those involving in the crime can be relevant and it will be easier for investigators as well as law enforcement
