1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
tamaranim1 [39]
3 years ago
7

(MC)Why did the Lend-Lease program anger isolationists?

History
2 answers:
hoa [83]3 years ago
4 0
That it was seen as a way to undermine the Neutrality Acts. In a way, they were right. Lend-Lease basically killed the Neutrality Acts when it was finally put into action and pushed the US a step closer to being a full participant in the war. It wasn't seen as a drain on the US Treasury and isolationists weren't upset over it because of support for the Axis powers -- it wasn't why the Lend Lease program was drafted up in the first place. It also wasn't seen as a direct violation of US law since it still had to be approved by Congress, though isolationists saw it as a violation of their belief that the US shouldn't get involved with foreign conflicts.
Aneli [31]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

Isolationists were furious that the Lend-Lease Program ended America's policy of neutrality and non-intervention.

Explanation:

"Lend-Lease" is an almost unknown law, but it was an important milestone during World War II. While the Red Army fought against the Germans, by this read the United States delivered weapons, food, airplanes and vehicles to the Soviets, to Britain, China, Free France and other allied nations.

This has infuriated many American isolationists because they believed that the United States should maintain its policy of neutrality through European conflicts. Once the Lend-Lease program was approved, the policy of neutrality and non-interference would be over.

You might be interested in
What was galileo forced to say during his trial ?
Sonbull [250]

Answer:

During his trial for suspicion of heresy, Galileo chose his words carefully. It was only after the trial, angered by his conviction no doubt, that he was said to have muttered to the inquisitors, “Eppur si muove”(“And yet it moves)”, as if to say that they may have won this battle, but in the end, truth would win out.

<h3>#Correct me if I'm wrong</h3><h2>#HopeitsHelp</h2>
5 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What reason was given for needing an embargo on cuba? (john f kennedy)
Liula [17]

IAnswer:

Im not sure how well this use of the information will help you but,

Source: "<em>In February 1962, President John F. Kennedy proclaimed an embargo on trade between the United States and Cuba, in response to certain actions taken by the Cuban government and directed the Department of Commerce and the Treasury to implement the embargo, which remains in place today. In February 1962, President John F. Kennedy proclaimed an embargo on trade between the United States and Cuba, in response to certain actions taken by the Cuban Government, and directed the Departments of Commerce and the Treasury to implement the embargo, which remains in place today. Beyond criticisms of human rights in Cuba, the United States holds $6 billion worth of financial claims against the Cuban government. The pro-embargo position is that the U.S. embargo is, in part, an appropriate response to these unaddressed claims."</em>

Paraphrasing - In February 1962, President John F. Kennedy announced an Associate in Nursing embargo on trade between  U. S. and Cuba, in response to sure actions taken by the Cuban government, and directed the Department of Commerce and therefore the Treasury to implement the embargo. In February 1962, President John F. Kennedy announced an Associate in Nursing embargo on trade between u. s. and Cuba, in response to sure actions taken by the Cuban government, and directed the Department of Commerce and therefore the Treasury to implement the embargo, that remains in situ these days. on the far side of criticisms of human rights in Cuba, the U.S. holds a $6 billion value of economic claims against the Cuban government. The pro-embargo position is that the U.S. embargo is, in part, Associate in Nursing applicable response to those unaddressed claims.

Explanation:

The "source" is the information where i got it from and the "paraphrased" part is fully rewritten, ps sorry if it's a bit long and wordy! hope this helps have a great day :)

7 0
2 years ago
Which of the following was a cause of conflict between Native Americans and the United States government?
weqwewe [10]
The fact that the united states government was taking their land without disscussing it with them

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which statement best describes the role of patrons in medieval Islamic society?
Lera25 [3.4K]

The correct answer is D they supported charity such as hospitals and schools hope this helps

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What is the main purpose of the list of grievances included in the Declaration of Independence?
garri49 [273]

Answer:

the second one as the declaration was a proclamation of war.

8 0
1 year ago
Other questions:
  • Why did the senators decide to assassinate Julius Caesar?
    12·2 answers
  • Date of battle of Yorktown
    10·2 answers
  • What was the significance of these marines raising the American flag on Iwo Jima?
    10·1 answer
  • what were three weaknesses of non-european regions that allowed european powers to control or colonize them?
    14·1 answer
  • What did French aristocrats do in an effort to keep their privileges?
    6·2 answers
  • Explain how mass production led to the spread of capitalism beyond the agricultural aspects of
    15·1 answer
  • How did the Erie Canal help to develop the market economy in the north ?
    12·1 answer
  • Did the Nazi party believe in democracy?
    15·2 answers
  • 17) Which of the following was a result of foreign investments in Russia:
    12·1 answer
  • Please select the word from the list that best fits the definition
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!