Answer:
The correct answer here would be Austin, Texas
Explanation:
There are a lot of things that make Austin a great place for a large tech company.
To start with Austin is centrally located in the State and has great links with the rest of the country. The local population is young and has some fantastic schools that have supplied a steady stream of high-skilled workforce.
The area also has very affordable housing compared to other larger cities such as Houston or LA.
Add to this, some great weather year round and it's not hard to understand why over 50 of America's fortune 500 companies are headquartered in the city.
I would argue that John Locke had the most direct influence. Locke believed all men were born a "blank slate" and were shaped by their experiences. The Declaration declares similarly that "All men are created equal".
Para obtener mas recursos y explotación económica (me refiero al ámbito de producción) y más que nada por demostrar la potencia militar de un país
The North was led by a communist regime under Kim ll Sung who was supported by the Soviets. The South was led by a nationalist Rhee who was supported by the U.S. Since both wanted to conquer the entire Korean Peninsula and both were aligned with different political ideologies, it wasn't too unreasonable that Kim decided to attack the South. As a result, America, who adopted a policy of containment under Truman, wanted to expel communist influence as much as possible, which led to America playing a role in mobilizing a UN force to support the South.
Answer:
That depends on what you mean by "presented."
Cases are typically appealed to the US Supreme Court on a
petition for a writ of certiorari, which includes a legal
brief prepared by the attorney or attorneys for the petitioner
(similar to a plaintiff). The respondent(s)' attorney(s) may oppose
the petition with their own brief.
If the Court grants certiorari, the case may be scheduled for
oral argument, allowing each side 30 minutes to explain to
the justices why their client should prevail. During oral argument,
the justices ask questions about the case or relevant precedents
and points of law (although the justices are often better prepared
than the attorneys, already know the answers to the questions, and
may have already decided how they are going to vote after case
conference).
-Hops
