Answer:
Sharpe ratio = 0.20
Treynor ratio = –0.005
Explanation:
Note: See the attached excel file for the calculations of average rate of returns, standard deviations and beta used in the calculation below.
a. Calculation of Sharpe ratio
Sharpe ratio refers to a investment measurement that employed to measure the an investment actual that has been adjusted for the risk associated with the investment.
Sharpe ratio can be calculated using the following formula:
Sharpe ratio = (Average fund rate - Average Risk Free rate) / Standard deviation of fund rate = (5.46% - 2.40%) / 15.05% = 0.20
a. Calculation of Treynor ratio
Treynor ratio refers to investment measurement that is calculated to show the risk of certain investments after the volatility of the market has been taking into consideration.
Treynor ratio can be calculated using the following formula:
Treynor ratio = (Average market return rate - Average Risk Free rate) / Beta = (1.96% - 2.40%) / 87.53% = –0.005
Answer:
The correct answer is option (A).
Explanation:
According to the scenario, the computation of the given data are as follows:
First, we will calculate the Market risk premium, then
Market risk premium = (Required return - Risk free rate ) ÷ beta
= ( 9.50% - 4.20%) ÷ 1.05 = 5.048%
So, now Required rate of return for new portfolio = Risk free rate + Beta of new portfolio × Market premium risk
Where, Beta of new portfolio = (10 ÷ 18.5) × 1.05 + (8.5 ÷ 18.5) × 0.65
= 0.5676 + 0.2986
= 0.8662
By putting the value, we get
Required rate of return = 4.20% + 0.8662 × 5.048%
= 8.57%
The answer to this question is: engagement
In business terms, engagement refers to The emotional commitment that each employee has towards the company where they work.
Company with high engagement level often produce more employees that willing to take initiative and sacrifices in order to obtain company's goals
Answer:
<em>Ratification by Principal One of the criteria for enactment is that all material truths involved in the transaction must be known to the Principal. Van Stavern was not aware of Hash's behaviour. </em>
He did not realize that somehow the steel is being shipped under his name, and that the shipments were being billed him directly. Unlike liability through obvious authority, approval by the principal is a positive act by which he or she acknowledges the agent's illegal actions.
Just a principal would ratify; thus, Van Stavern was not directly imputed to information by the invoices and checks signed by Van Stavern's workers.
The court stated that the use of corporate checks was further proof that Van Stavern regarded the expenditures as business, not private. So Van Stavern could not be held personally liable.
Remember that on Sutton Steel that's not excessively harsh. Sutton understood it was working with a building company and did not seek to get the personal approval of the contract from Van Stavern.
<em>Lawfully, Sutton's agreement in this case is called an unaccepted offer which can be withdrawn at any time.</em>
<em></em>
Answer:
1)Verify compliance with the IA documents
2) Conduct periodic vulnerability assessments
Explanation:
From the question we are given about instance, whereby Your organization entered into an interoperability agreement (IA) with another organization a year ago. As a part of this agreement, a federated trust was established between your domain and the partner domain. The partnership has been in the ongoing operations phase for almost nine months now. As a security administrator,. In this case, the tasks should you complete during this phase are;
1)Verify compliance with the IA documents
2) Conduct periodic vulnerability
An organisational interoperability agreement can be regarded as a resource which can be attributed to a private nature which give the structure of governance rules so that there will be a working relationship among
digital public services to have a functioning value.
