All categories

3 years ago

Your division is considering two projects with the following cash flows (in millions):

Business

2 answers:

eimsori [14]3 years ago

8 0

Answer:

Explanation:

1.If WACC = 5%

Project A

Year Cash Flow PV factor @5% (a)* (b)

(b)

0 -$29 1 - $29

1 $15 0.952 $14.28

2 $13 0.907 $11.791

3 $3 0.864 $2.592

__________

NPV = - $ 0.337 millions

Project B

Year Cash Flow PV factor @5% (a)* (b)

(b)

0 -$16 1 - $16

1 $8 0.952 $7.616

2 $3 0.907 $2.721

3 $6 0.864 $5.184

__________

NPV = - $ 0.479 millions

2. If WACC = 10 %

Project A

Year Cash Flow PV factor @10% (a)* (b)

(b)

0 -$29 1 - $29

1 $15 0.909 $13.635

2 $13 0.826 $10.738

3 $3 0.751 $2.253

__________

NPV = - $ 2.374 millions

Project B

Year Cash Flow PV factor @10% (a)* (b)

(b)

0 -$16 1 - $16

1 $8 0.909 $7.272

2 $3 0.826 $2.478

3 $6 0.751 $4.506

__________

NPV = - $ 1.744 millions

3. If WACC = 15%

Project A

Year Cash Flow PV factor @ 15% (a)* (b)

(b)

0 -$29 1 - $29

1 $15 0.870 $13.05

2 $13 0.756 $9.828

3 $3 0.658 $1.974

__________

NPV = -$ 4.148 millions

Project B

Year Cash Flow PV factor @15% (a)* (b)

(b)

0 -$16 1 - $16

1 $8 0.870 $6.96

2 $3 0.756 $2.268

3 $6 0.658 $3.948

__________

NPV = -$ 2.824 millions

4. If WACC = 5% , IRR = ?

Project A

Year Cash Flow PV factor @5% PV factor @ 4% (a)* (b) (a) *(c)

(b) (c)

0 -$29 1 1 - $29 -$29

1 $15 0.952 0.962 $14.28 $14.43

2 $13 0.907 0.925 $11.791 $12.025

3 $3 0.864 0.889 $2.592 $2.667

__________ ____________

NPV = - $ 0.337 m NPV = -$0.122 m

Since NPV is fairly close to zero at 4% value of r, therefore IRR ≈ 4%

Project B

Year Cash Flow PV factor @5% PV factor @ 3% (a)* (b) (a) * (c)

(b) (c)

0 -$16 1 1 - $16 -$16

1 $8 0.952 0.971 $7.616 $7.768

2 $3 0.907 0.943 $2.721 $2.829

3 $6 0.864 0.915 $5.184 $5.49

__________ ____________

NPV = -$ 0.479 m NPV= - $ .087

Since NPV is fairly close to zero at 3% value of r, therefore IRR ≈ 3%

5. If WACC = 10% , IRR = ?

Project A

Year Cash Flow PV factor @10% PV factor @ 8% (a)* (b) (a) *(c)

(b) (c)

0 -$29 1 1 - $29 -$29

1 $15 0.909 0.926 $13.635 $13.89

2 $13 0.826 0.857 $10.738 $11.141

3 $3 0.751 0.792 $2.253 $2.376

__________ ____________

NPV = - $ 2.374 m NPV = -$1.593 m

Since NPV is fairly close to zero at 8% value of r, therefore IRR ≈ 8%

Project B

Year Cash Flow PV factor @10% PV factor @ 8% (a)* (b) (a) * (c)

(b) (c)

0 -$16 1 1 - $16 -$16

1 $8 0.909 0.926 $ 7.272 $7.408

2 $3 0.826 0.857 $ 2.478 $2.571

3 $6 0.751 0.792 $ 4.506 $4.752

__________ ____________

NPV = - $ 1.744 m NPV= - $1.269

Since NPV is fairly close to zero at 8% value of r, therefore IRR ≈ 8%

6. If WACC = 15% , IRR =?

Project A

Year Cash Flow PV factor @ 15% (a)* (b)

(b)

0 -$29 1 - $29

1 $15 0.870 $13.05

2 $13 0.756 $9.828

3 $3 0.658 $1.974

__________

NPV = -$ 4.148 millions

NPV @ 8% = -$ 1.593

Since NPV is fairly close to zero at 8% value of r, therefore IRR ≈ 8%

Project B

Year Cash Flow PV factor @15% (a)* (b)

(b)

0 -$16 1 - $16

1 $8 0.870 $6.96

2 $3 0.756 $2.268

3 $6 0.658 $3.948

__________

NPV = -$ 2.824 millions

NPV @ 8% = -$1.269

Since NPV is fairly close to zero at 8% value of r, therefore IRR ≈ 8%

7.If WACC = 5%

Project A

Year Cash Flow PV factor @5% (a)* (b)

(b)

0 -$29 1 - $29

1 $15 0.952 $14.28

2 $13 0.907 $11.791

3 $3 0.864 $2.592

__________

NPV = - $ 0.337 millions

Project B

Year Cash Flow PV factor @5% (a)* (b)

(b)

0 -$16 1 - $16

1 $8 0.952 $7.616

2 $3 0.907 $2.721

3 $6 0.864 $5.184

__________

NPV = - $ 0.479 millions

NPV of project B > project A than choose Project B

2. If WACC = 10 %

Project A

Year Cash Flow PV factor @10% (a)* (b)

(b)

0 -$29 1 - $29

1 $15 0.909 $13.635

2 $13 0.826 $10.738

3 $3 0.751 $2.253

__________

NPV = - $ 2.374 millions

Project B

Year Cash Flow PV factor @10% (a)* (b)

(b)

0 -$16 1 - $16

1 $8 0.909 $7.272

2 $3 0.826 $2.478

3 $6 0.751 $4.506

__________

NPV = - $ 1.744 millions

NPV of project A > project B than choose Project A

3. If WACC = 15%

Project A

Year Cash Flow PV factor @ 15% (a)* (b)

(b)

0 -$29 1 - $29

1 $15 0.870 $13.05

2 $13 0.756 $9.828

3 $3 0.658 $1.974

__________

NPV = -$ 4.148 millions

Project BYear Cash Flow PV factor @15% (a)* (b)

(b)

0 -$16 1 - $16

1 $8 0.870 $6.96

2 $3 0.756 $2.268

3 $6 0.658 $3.948

__________

NPV = -$ 2.824 millions

NPV of project A > project B than choose Project A

Law Incorporation [45]3 years ago

4 0

Answer:

Below is attached the file containing answer of the above mention question

Explanation:

Download docx

You might be interested in

Jason is going to play golf this afternoon and has to choose between two different golf courses. The greens fees to play each ar

yuradex [85]

Answer:

Explanation:

the relevant total cost is 4 dollars

3 0

2 years ago

"A property has been assessed at $40,000. The city tax rate is 10 mills, the county tax rate is 9 mills, and the school board le

melamori03 [73]

Answer:

Amount saved by the owner is $225.

Explanation:

given,

the property has been assessed = $40,000

the city tax rate = 10 mills = 0.001

country tax rate = 9 mills = 0.009

school board levy = 9 mills = 0.008

owner gets homestead tax exemption of = ?

Homestead tax exemption is used to same money from paying tax on their property every year.

homestead tax exemption given is $25,000

Money saved by owner = $25,000 homestead exemption × county tax rate

= $25000 × 0.009

= $ 225

Amount saved by the owner is $225.

3 0

3 years ago

Which of the following factors is not used to determine whether an activity is a hobby or a business?A) the taxpayer's expertise

melisa1 [442]

Answer: Option D

Explanation: As per the tax laws, the activities in which the taxpayer has expertise in and he or she is getting some kind of monetary benefit from performing it, then such activity will be seen as a business.

However, if the taxpayer do not repetitively perform an activity and derives no personal gain other than pleasure from performing such activity, then it will be a hobby.

Hence from the above we can conclude that the correct option is D.

7 0

3 years ago

im was a crook. He embezzled $450,000 from his employer. When his employer found out about his misdeeds, before even conducting

Masja [62]

Answer:

Unless the company is 100% certain that it can prove Jim's misdeeds and has all the evidence to support their accusation, they should have waited for the police to act first before going to the newspaper. If their is the minimum chance that they cannot prove their accusations, Jim might be able to sue them for libel.

5 0

2 years ago

Proposal #1 would extend trade credit to some customers that previously have been denied credit because they were considered poo

wolverine [178]

Answer: See explanation

Explanation:

a. Compute the incremental income after taxes that would result from these projections:

Sales increase= $200,000

Less: Uncollectible accounts:

= 7% × $200,000

= ($14,000)

Annual incremental value= $186,000

Less: Collection cost:

= 3% × $200,000

= ($6000)

Less: Production and selling cost:

= 80% × $200,000

= ($160,000)

Incremental income before tax= $20000

Tax at 30% = ($6000)

Incremental income after tax = $14000

b. Compute the incremental Return on Sales if these new credit customers are accepted If the receivable turnover ratio is expected to be 4 to 1 and no other asset buildup is needed to serve the new customer.

Incremental Return on Sales will be:

= Incremental income after taxes ÷ Increase in sales

= $14000/$200000

= 7%

c. Compute the additional investment in Accounts Receivable.

Since the receivable turnover ratio will be 4, then the additional investment in the accounts receivable will be:

= Additional credit sales/Receivable turnover ratio

= $200000 /4

= $50,000

Therefore, the additional investment in the accounts receivable will be $50,000.

d. Compute the incremental Return on New Investment.

The incremental return on new investment will be:

= Incremental income after taxes/Additional investment

= $14000/$50000

= 28%

e. If your company requires a 20% Rate of Return on Investment for all proposals, do the numbers suggest that trade credit should be extended to these new customers? Explain.

Yes, the numbers implies that trade credit should be extended to these new customers. This is because the incremental return on the new investment is 28%, and this is higher than the rate of return on investment which is 20%.

5 0

3 years ago