All categories

3 years ago

Your division is considering two projects with the following cash flows (in millions):

Business

2 answers:

eimsori [14]3 years ago

8 0

Answer:

Explanation:

1.If WACC = 5%

Project A

Year Cash Flow PV factor @5% (a)* (b)

(b)

0 -$29 1 - $29

1 $15 0.952 $14.28

2 $13 0.907 $11.791

3 $3 0.864 $2.592

__________

NPV = - $ 0.337 millions

Project B

Year Cash Flow PV factor @5% (a)* (b)

(b)

0 -$16 1 - $16

1 $8 0.952 $7.616

2 $3 0.907 $2.721

3 $6 0.864 $5.184

__________

NPV = - $ 0.479 millions

2. If WACC = 10 %

Project A

Year Cash Flow PV factor @10% (a)* (b)

(b)

0 -$29 1 - $29

1 $15 0.909 $13.635

2 $13 0.826 $10.738

3 $3 0.751 $2.253

__________

NPV = - $ 2.374 millions

Project B

Year Cash Flow PV factor @10% (a)* (b)

(b)

0 -$16 1 - $16

1 $8 0.909 $7.272

2 $3 0.826 $2.478

3 $6 0.751 $4.506

__________

NPV = - $ 1.744 millions

3. If WACC = 15%

Project A

Year Cash Flow PV factor @ 15% (a)* (b)

(b)

0 -$29 1 - $29

1 $15 0.870 $13.05

2 $13 0.756 $9.828

3 $3 0.658 $1.974

__________

NPV = -$ 4.148 millions

Project B

Year Cash Flow PV factor @15% (a)* (b)

(b)

0 -$16 1 - $16

1 $8 0.870 $6.96

2 $3 0.756 $2.268

3 $6 0.658 $3.948

__________

NPV = -$ 2.824 millions

4. If WACC = 5% , IRR = ?

Project A

Year Cash Flow PV factor @5% PV factor @ 4% (a)* (b) (a) *(c)

(b) (c)

0 -$29 1 1 - $29 -$29

1 $15 0.952 0.962 $14.28 $14.43

2 $13 0.907 0.925 $11.791 $12.025

3 $3 0.864 0.889 $2.592 $2.667

__________ ____________

NPV = - $ 0.337 m NPV = -$0.122 m

Since NPV is fairly close to zero at 4% value of r, therefore IRR ≈ 4%

Project B

Year Cash Flow PV factor @5% PV factor @ 3% (a)* (b) (a) * (c)

(b) (c)

0 -$16 1 1 - $16 -$16

1 $8 0.952 0.971 $7.616 $7.768

2 $3 0.907 0.943 $2.721 $2.829

3 $6 0.864 0.915 $5.184 $5.49

__________ ____________

NPV = -$ 0.479 m NPV= - $ .087

Since NPV is fairly close to zero at 3% value of r, therefore IRR ≈ 3%

5. If WACC = 10% , IRR = ?

Project A

Year Cash Flow PV factor @10% PV factor @ 8% (a)* (b) (a) *(c)

(b) (c)

0 -$29 1 1 - $29 -$29

1 $15 0.909 0.926 $13.635 $13.89

2 $13 0.826 0.857 $10.738 $11.141

3 $3 0.751 0.792 $2.253 $2.376

__________ ____________

NPV = - $ 2.374 m NPV = -$1.593 m

Since NPV is fairly close to zero at 8% value of r, therefore IRR ≈ 8%

Project B

Year Cash Flow PV factor @10% PV factor @ 8% (a)* (b) (a) * (c)

(b) (c)

0 -$16 1 1 - $16 -$16

1 $8 0.909 0.926 $ 7.272 $7.408

2 $3 0.826 0.857 $ 2.478 $2.571

3 $6 0.751 0.792 $ 4.506 $4.752

__________ ____________

NPV = - $ 1.744 m NPV= - $1.269

Since NPV is fairly close to zero at 8% value of r, therefore IRR ≈ 8%

6. If WACC = 15% , IRR =?

Project A

Year Cash Flow PV factor @ 15% (a)* (b)

(b)

0 -$29 1 - $29

1 $15 0.870 $13.05

2 $13 0.756 $9.828

3 $3 0.658 $1.974

__________

NPV = -$ 4.148 millions

NPV @ 8% = -$ 1.593

Since NPV is fairly close to zero at 8% value of r, therefore IRR ≈ 8%

Project B

Year Cash Flow PV factor @15% (a)* (b)

(b)

0 -$16 1 - $16

1 $8 0.870 $6.96

2 $3 0.756 $2.268

3 $6 0.658 $3.948

__________

NPV = -$ 2.824 millions

NPV @ 8% = -$1.269

Since NPV is fairly close to zero at 8% value of r, therefore IRR ≈ 8%

7.If WACC = 5%

Project A

Year Cash Flow PV factor @5% (a)* (b)

(b)

0 -$29 1 - $29

1 $15 0.952 $14.28

2 $13 0.907 $11.791

3 $3 0.864 $2.592

__________

NPV = - $ 0.337 millions

Project B

Year Cash Flow PV factor @5% (a)* (b)

(b)

0 -$16 1 - $16

1 $8 0.952 $7.616

2 $3 0.907 $2.721

3 $6 0.864 $5.184

__________

NPV = - $ 0.479 millions

NPV of project B > project A than choose Project B

2. If WACC = 10 %

Project A

Year Cash Flow PV factor @10% (a)* (b)

(b)

0 -$29 1 - $29

1 $15 0.909 $13.635

2 $13 0.826 $10.738

3 $3 0.751 $2.253

__________

NPV = - $ 2.374 millions

Project B

Year Cash Flow PV factor @10% (a)* (b)

(b)

0 -$16 1 - $16

1 $8 0.909 $7.272

2 $3 0.826 $2.478

3 $6 0.751 $4.506

__________

NPV = - $ 1.744 millions

NPV of project A > project B than choose Project A

3. If WACC = 15%

Project A

Year Cash Flow PV factor @ 15% (a)* (b)

(b)

0 -$29 1 - $29

1 $15 0.870 $13.05

2 $13 0.756 $9.828

3 $3 0.658 $1.974

__________

NPV = -$ 4.148 millions

Project BYear Cash Flow PV factor @15% (a)* (b)

(b)

0 -$16 1 - $16

1 $8 0.870 $6.96

2 $3 0.756 $2.268

3 $6 0.658 $3.948

__________

NPV = -$ 2.824 millions

NPV of project A > project B than choose Project A

Law Incorporation [45]3 years ago

4 0

Answer:

Below is attached the file containing answer of the above mention question

Explanation:

Download docx

You might be interested in

The market capitalization rate for Admiral Motors Company is 8%. Its expected ROE is 10% and its expected EPS is $5. The firm's

pashok25 [27]

Answer:

(A) 6%

(B) 20

Explanation:

The market capitalization rate for Admiral motors is 8%

= 8/100

= 0.08

The expected ROE is 10%

= 10/100

= 0.1

The expected EPS is $5

The Plowback ratio is 60%

= 60/100

= 0.6

(A) The growth rate can be calculated as follows

= Plowback ratio × ROE

= 0.6 × 0.1

= 0.06×100

= 6%

Hence the growth rate is 6%

(B) The P/E ratio can be calculated as follows

= 1-0.6/0.08-0.06

= 0.4/0.02

= 20

Hence the P/E ratio is 20

5 0

3 years ago

Is there anyone who's good in economics that can help me with my questions and can provide me the CORRECT answers, please?

Alex777 [14]

I am willing to assist you in economics I passed with an A !

6 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

A city government is considering two types of town-dump sanitary systems. Design A requires an initial outlay of $405 comma 00

SIZIF [17.4K]

Answer:

Desing A is a better deal as the equivalent annual cost is lower than desing B

Anywa, bot desing cost are above the city collections thus, it cannot afford the sanitary systems unless it raises taxes

Explanation:

Desing A

F0 405,000

operating and maintenance cost 51,000 for 14 years

Present value of the operating and maintenance cost:

$C \times \frac{1-(1+r)^{-time} }{rate} = PV\\$

C = $ 51,000.00

time = 14 years

rate = 0.07

$51000 \times \frac{1-(1+0.07)^{-14} }{0.07} = PV\\$

PV $446,018.8673

net worth: $ 851,081.87

equivalent annual cost:

$PV \div \frac{1-(1+r)^{-time} }{rate} = C\\$

PV 851,082

time 14

rate 0.07

$851081.87 \div \frac{1-(1+0.07)^{-14} }{0.07} = C\\$

C $ 97,316.904

Desing B

F0 251,000

operating and maintenance cost 89,000 for 14 years

$C \times \frac{1-(1+r)^{-time} }{rate} = PV\\$

C 89,000.00

time 14

rate 0.07

$89000 \times \frac{1-(1+0.07)^{-14} }{0.07} = PV\\$

PV $778,346.6507

net worth: $ 1,029,346.65

equivalent annual cost:

$1029346.65 \div \frac{1-(1+0.07)^{-14} }{0.07} = C\\$

C $ 117,700.580

5 0

3 years ago

Autoliv produces air bag systems that it sells to automobile manufacturers throughout the world. Assume the company has a capaci

gogolik [260]

Answer: See explanation

Explanation:

a. The variable cost per unit will be:

= (3,825,000 - 3,680,000) / (45million - 40 million)

= 0.029

Then, the financial order of accepting the order will be:

Contribution margin = Unit selling price - Unit

= 65 - 29

= 36

Since the size of the order is 100,000, the financial impact of accepting the order will be:

= 36 × 100,000

= 3,600,000

b. The differential analysis will be:

Contribution from special order = 3,600,000

Opportunity cost {100,000 = 120,000,000 - 29,000,000 = 9,100,000

Net disadvantage of accepting order will then be:

= 3600000 - 9100000

= 5,500,000

5 0

3 years ago

Suppose it is 1810. what advice would you give tecumseh to help him be more successful in his goals than he actually was?

Mashutka [201]

I would probably urge him to engage in guerrilla warfare to be more successful in his military campaigns against the American troops and to fortify his new town Prophetstown to be better prepared against attack by American forces .

7 0

3 years ago