I believe the answer is: <span>Submit his research proposal to each school's institutional review board (IRB).
Internal review board is an independent organization that established in order to determine the validity of a research and the ethical standard that used during the research. The standard that imposed by institutional review board usually would be aligned with the standard that written under the law.</span>
Answer: A. designating an anti-charity should be more effective because loss aversion will provide additional motivation
.
Options:
A. designating an anti-charity should be more effective because loss
aversion will provide additional motivation
B. designating a charity should be more effective because it avoids all potential for loss
C. it shouldn’t matter whether one designates a charity or anti-charity
D. self-interest biases generally keep people from choosing the anti-charity
Explanation:
The study of behavioral Economics shows that people are more driven by the loss of fear than the hope of gain. This is known as loss aversion. In commitment contracts where penalty money is promised to a charity or an anti-charity if the goal is not achieved, those who promise their money to an anti-charity tend to achieve their goals more. The same also applies when comparing this group and those who do not have to forego anything if they do not meet their target.
This is because giving to a charity will still seem beneficial while losing the money to an anti-charity will seem like a total loss.
Answer:
Heuristic thinking
Explanation:
This form of thinking involves educated and calculated guess, it involves critical thinking that leads to a major decision. It can be understood that Raul is trying to figure out the right man for the job, convergent thinking is used majorly in questions and answers, trying to pick this right answer from the question, same goes to divergent as that is the opposite of convergent. The best thinking that explains what Raul is trying to figure out is heuristic thinking.
Answer:Yes, affirmatively. A thorough study of the data has unveiled sufficient resources to align with the fact that without mail-in is possible.
Explanation: With proper analysis, a vast majority will subscribe to the ground of basic electrical points.
Answer:
a
gradually became more liberal.
Explanation:
From 1985-2005, the Supreme Court became gradually more liberal before becoming more conservative for a time and then more liberal again. It is likely that with the addition of Gorsuch and Kavanaugh that the Court will shift Conservative again.
