Answer:2. active (niche-picking) genotype-environment
Explanation:
Active (Niche-Picking) Genotype-Environment Correlations is how children look for the environment that matches their capabilities and stimulate them. Niche-picking refers to how those environment that they choose suit or aligns well with their abilities. It is related to their genotype, meaning they have a heritable drive or traits which make them move towards that direction.
For example athletic Brad is inclined to choose a sport team because he is athletic whilst Stephen who loves math is inclined to choose a math club. Their characteristics drives them towards these unique choices.
Response to intervention (RTI) wants to identify students with difficulties
, the student learning monitoring and offer interventions for the development of academic skills.
The service in an individual (can also be done with doubles or threes) and is aimed at students who have significant learning difficulties and / or disorders. Thus, they are those who did not respond adequately to Preventive or Supplementary Interventions. Experienced professionals perform high-quality intervention at a time other than regular education, at school or in specialized clinics. In many cases, the therapeutic plan is built with the help of a multidisciplinary team to encompass biopsychosocial causes and consequences. As in layers 1 and 2, monitoring student response to intervention serves to modify intervention strategies and intensity.
I believe the answer is: Glaucoma
Glaucoma is a form of physical disorder that caused by <span> elevated intraocular pressure that damage the optic nerves.
This causes many of people in older generation to dramatically lose the quality of their vision, in some cases it may resulted in Blindness.</span>
Answer:
Because every society needs to vary to explain uncommon phenomenon and deviance. Saying evil in people is innate makes the deviance into something that is not the product of the flaws in society, but the natural course of things.
Explanation:
All people and cultures need to understand the phenomenons around them, especially when they are uncommon and don’t fit the norm. <u>The notion of evil, deviance, and wrongdoing is something negative in every culture</u><u>, even though what belongs to that category differs.</u> However, all societies want to explain where deviance comes from.
One of the easiest explanations that can be offered is that evil is innate and the product of nature. <u>When evil is understood as a product of nature, it can carry the idea that something is wrong with society, and that something malignant exists in the organization and institution that can produce evil.</u>
<u></u>
It is much more secure for the existing system to see evil as the natural and inborn product that universally exists.
The answer is<u> "Daniel's theory cannot be disproven."</u>
A scientific theory is an all around substantiated clarification of some part of the natural world, in view of an assortment of actualities that have been over and again affirmed through perception and examination. Such certainty upheld hypotheses are not "surmises" but rather dependable records of this present reality.
On the off chance that its absolutely impossible a theory can be disproved at that point it is extremely unlikely the theory (or model) can be changed/made strides. This is the key refinement amongst philosophy and science.
