We are given the different rates and charges and is asked in the problem the unknown tax rate she pays on meals if the total cost of the trip is equal ot $420.04. In this case, the equation goes:
80 x 3 + 80 x 0.1 x 3 + 80 x 0.09 x 3 + 109.3 x 1.15 + 109. 3 x z = 420.04
z = 0.08
<u>Explanation</u>:
A trade school is becoming popular this because it serves as a home to acquire technical education.
Thus anyone who wants to learn a skill having no prior experience is a best fit for trade school. A major benefit of the trade school is that it provides practical lessons to students, often times they are grouped together in peers for projects which encourages group learning.
Answer:
A) 19.91%
Explanation:
Net present value of cash flow at 19.91% can be calculated as follows
- 100000 + 30000/1.1991 + 30000/ (1.1991)² + 30000/(1.1991)³ + 30000/ (1.1991)⁴ +30000/(1.1991)⁵ + 30000/ (1.1991)⁶
= -100000 + 25018 +20864 +17400 +14511 +12101 +10092
= 0 ( approx )
So the IRR for the project is 19.91 % .
Answer:
The answer is: A) A decrease in the price of paper used to make greeting cards.
Explanation:
In normal market conditions, an increase in the equilibrium quantity of greeting cards means that the quantity demanded and the quantity supplied of greetings cards increased. Usually an increase in the quantity supplied will result in an increase of the price of the good or service. But on this specific case something else made the price of the cards decrease. The only one of the four possible options that can explain an external cause for a decrease in the price of greetings cards, is a decrease in the price of paper used to manufacture them.
Answer:
The correct answer ise. do nothing and leave prices unchanged.
Explanation:
It has been observed that many oligopolistic industries exhibit an appreciable degree of price rigidity or stability. In other words, in many oligopolistic industries prices remain sticky or inflexible, that is, there is no tendency for oligopolists to change the price even if economic conditions undergo a change.
There have been many explanations of this price rigidity in the oligopoly and the most popular explanation is the so-called crooked demand curve hypothesis. The crooked demand curve hypothesis was presented independently by Paul M. Sweezy, an American economist, and by Hall and Hitch, Oxford economists.
It is to explain the price and production under oligopoly with product differentiation, that economists often use the hypothesis of the crooked demand curve. This is because when products under oligopoly differ, it is unlikely that when a company increases its price, all customers abandon it because some customers are intimately linked to it due to product differentiation.
As a result, the demand curve facing a company under differentiated oligopoly is not perfectly elastic. On the other hand, under the oligopoly without product differentiation, when a company increases its price, all its customers leave it, so that the demand curve faced by an oligopolist that produces a homogeneous product can be perfectly elastic.
