Answer:
company B's cost of equity is 14.0375% - 8.975% = 5.0625% higher than company A's cost of equity
Explanation:
cost of equity = risk free rate + (beta x market premium)
risk free rate = 4.25%
market premium = market return - risk free rate = 11% - 4.25% = 6.75%
Company A's cost of equity = 4.25% + (0.7 x 6.75%) = 8.975%
Company B's cost of equity = 4.25% x (1.45 x 6.75%) = 14.0375%
this means that company B's cost of equity is 14.0375% - 8.975% = 5.0625% higher than company A's cost of equity.
If i am correct then the answer should be true letter b.)
Answer:
Casey's opportunity cost of producing 1 kg of potatoes is 5 kg of steak.
Casey's opportunity cost of producing 1 kg of steak is 0.2 kg of potatoes.
Rick's opportunity cost of producing 1 kg of potatoes is 3 kg of steak.
Rick's opportunity cost of producing 1 kg of steak is 0.33 kg of potatoes.
Casey should produce steak while Rick should produce potatoes, since Rick has a comparative advantage in producing potatoes (lower opportunity cost) and Casey has a comparative advantage in producing steak.
As long as the price of steak per kilogram of potatoes is less than 5 kg of steak and more than 3 kg of steak, then both would win. In order for both of them to win is a similarly proportional way, the exchange price should be 4 kg of steak per kg of potatoes.
Answer:
E)
Explanation:
It was prepared for this because Starbucks tracked, as part of its ongoing environmental scanning activities, the percentage of households with single-cup brewers. The data that they managed to gather through this study allowed them to quickly determine that there was a large percentage of households with single-cup brewers and therefore the customer base was there. Having a large customer base would drastically increase their chances of obtaining massive profits by simply providing the necessary product to those households, which they plan to do with this partnership.
The answer to this question is bonds. Bonds are an
investment type where in investors’ gains a fixed-income over their
investments. Bonds are less risky because the return of investment is in a
fixed rate and this is less vulnerable to price swings in the stock market.
