how each of these "w"? im guessing it means work. and three weapons from then that are "new"? are:
Rifles. All nations used more than one type of firearm during the First World War. The rifles most commonly used by the major combatants were, among the Allies, the Lee-Enfield .303 (Britain and Commonwealth), Lebel and Berthier 8mm (France), Mannlicher–Carcano M1891, 6.5mm (Italy), Mosin–Nagant M1891 7.62 (Russia), and Springfield 1903 .30–06 (USA). The Central Powers employed Steyr–Mannlicher M95 (Austria-Hungary and Bulgaria), Mauser M98G 7.92mm (Germany), and Mauser M1877 7.65mm (Turkey). The American Springfield used a bolt-action design that so closely copied Mauser’s M1989 that the US Government had to pay a licensing fee to Mauser, a practice that continued until America entered the war.
Machine guns. Most machine guns of World War 1 were based on Hiram Maxim’s 1884 design. They had a sustained fire of 450–600 rounds per minute, allowing defenders to cut down attacking waves of enemy troops like a scythe cutting wheat. There was some speculation that the machine gun would completely replace the rifle. Contrary to popular belief, machine guns were not the most lethal weapon of the Great War. That dubious distinction goes to the artillery.
Flamethrowers. Reports of infantry using some sort of flame-throwing device can be found as far back as ancient China. During America’s Civil War some Southern newspapers claimed Abraham Lincoln had observed a test of such a weapon. But the first recorded use of hand-held flamethrowers in combat was on February 26, 1915, when the Germans deployed the weapon at Malancourt, near Verdun. Tanks carried on a man’s back used nitrogen pressure to spray fuel oil, which was ignited as it left the muzzle of a small, hand-directed pipe. Over the course of the war, Germany utilized 3,000 Flammenwerfer troops; over 650 flamethrower attacks were made. The British and French both developed flame-throwing weapons but did not make such extensive use of them.
there are many more, but here are 3 i found from a trustworthy source!
Answer:
The correct answer is A. Free-operant, trial-based; concurrent schedules, multiple schedules
The correct full sentence is:
Free operant and trial-based are stimulus preference assessment methods, while concurrent schedules and multiple schedules are reinforcer assessment methods.
Northeastern cities are important trade centers.
T<span>he following statement does not correctly describe the economic role of a northeastern city.
</span>D. Providence is a city not a county where there are farms.
Answer: $1,200,000
Explanation:
The firm should include $1,200,000 as the cost of the Manufacturing facility for a new project in it's analysis.
This is because $1,200,000 is the opportunity cost of not selling the facility. The old costs that were incurred for the land and the facility are to be considered sunk costs as they have already been incurred and the only relevant cost now is what the market will pay for the facility which is $1,200,000.
Answer:
14.57%
Explanation:
A stock has a beta of 1.4
The expected return is 18%
The risk free rate is 6%
Therefore, the expected return on the market portfolio can be calculated as follows
18%= 6% + 1.4(market return-6%)
18%= 6% + 1.4market return - 8.4
18%= 6-8.4 + 1.4market return
18%= -2.4% + 1.4market return
18%+2.4%= 1.4market return
20.4= 1.4market return
market return= 20.4/1.4
= 14.57%
Hence the expected return on the market portfolio is 14.57%
