<span>This is a negative externality. Since the cost of the traffic being in the community is not being borne by the theatre company itself, it is negative. The community as a whole is having to pay for the extra $5 in costs that will be accrued as a result of selling each ticket.</span>
The answer is less government regulation.
The other three are all restricting the businesses, even thought this statement was made by supporters of socially responsible businesses and the result should be positive.
I hope this helps!
Answer: Extra Vacation ; Stay
Explanation:
<em>At the Nash equilibrium, Deloitte will choose </em><em><u>extra vacation</u></em><em> and Malik will respond with </em><em><u>stay</u></em><em>.</em>
A Nash Equilibrium is the optimal outcome for each player given the decisions of the other player.
Looking at the the sequential game tree, if Deloitte offered a Money Bonus, Malik would leave because it offers him a higher payout. Deloitte would not want this because they gain more when he stays.
If Malik is offered extra vacation however, Malik stands to gain more than every other option if he stays and Deloitte would therefore offer him this because it will still be a gain for them. This is the Nash equilibrium.
Answer: The second stage is the "Storming Stage"
Explanation:
Bruce Tuckman's five-stage model of group and team development, propounded in 1965, consists of the forming, storming, norming, performing and adjourning stages.
The second stage, storming, is the most difficult and crucial stage in team development process, especially for a team that has never been together. At this stage, there's usually conflict of interests and members of the team may form "cliques" based on common grounds of agreement.
Performance of the team may decrease because members could begin to disagree on team goals and individual personalities emerge.
A solution would be for the team members to accept one another's individuality and focus on the task at hand.
