Answer:
Neither man wanted to press charges.
Explanation:
I'll just say why the other answers are wrong
B. There are witnesses, it says that several people were loitering around the club
C. There does not need to be camera footage of the fight to arrest one or both of the men and charge them with assault, battery, etc.
D. The officers arrived after the fight had ended and they had been injured, also officers do not personally have to witness a crime to charge an individual with one.
Answer:
c
Explanation:
'di ko sure HAHAHAHA pero sana tama
Answer: Some states may have different laws regarding the conservation of the environment as there is a difference of population between the states. This difference of population can result in some states having more pollution (higher populated states), and other states having less pollution (less populated states) resulting in different laws
In the first case with john, it is the case of negligence and as such, negligence lawsuit should be applied.
- In the case of John's pet alligator, one can say that it is strict liability lawsuit as it was not intentional.
- In the case of the company, it is the case of negligence and as such, negligence lawsuit should be applied.
<h3>What is the lawsuit about?</h3>
In a negligence lawsuit, the plaintiff is said to argue against the defendant's negligence or recklessness that has led to their injuries.
In a strict liability lawsuit, the defendant is known to be liable for damages even though he or she was said to not be negligent or at fault.
Learn more about negligence lawsuit from
brainly.com/question/14480857
#SPJ1
No, because it would be considered bribery of a government official which is illegal.