I think that the best answer is: <span>b.paleo Indians relied less on hunting big animals and more on fishing and gathering food
let's look at the options: </span><span>
a. paleo Indians went to war with each other on a large scale due to scarce water resources
- This could be true if it was really hot, but this was not the case. Warming did not mean a really hot climate, but less harsh: so actually, there would be more, not less water resources.
b.paleo Indians relied less on hunting big animals and more on fishing and gathering food
- this is possible ! a warmer climate would mean that there would be more possibility to fish or gather food, which would mean that people didn't have to hunt - and they would not want to hunt big animals, as it's dangerous.
c.paleo Indians faced food shortages that resulted in a lower population
-no, a warmer climate would mean more, not less, food
d.paleo Indians lost land to rising sea level's</span>
-no, they still had a lot of land.
Hi Ramzey
Answer: B
A legislature passes a bill that must be approved by voters
Hint: A referendum is a process that allows citizens to approve or reject a law by a legislature .
Good luck buddy , I hope that's help !
Answer:
I believe it would be C. to show how quickly cities grew after 1860 due to immigration, migration, and industrialization
Hope I helped :)
An infant's "comprehension" vocabulary develops faster than his or her "production" vocabulary.<span>
The difference between the two of them is that a comprehension vocabulary is to understand something while a production vocabulary is used to speak. </span>
