The question provides us with the following scenario: "Neil and Zack are working on a project that requires both research and presentation. Neil is better at research, so he gives the presentation to Zack. " A comparative advantage is when an agent is better at something or can produce something at a lower cost. Here, Neil can do research better, so the answer is: A.) Neil doing the research
They make laws to regulate the economy. Hope this helps :)
Answer:
C. Borrowing $43 at the risk-free rate and investing the total amount ($143) in the risky asset.
Explanation:
Outcome Return For $100 = (115 - 100)/100 = 15%;
0.15 = w1(0.12) + (1 - w1)(0.05)
0.15 = 0.12w1 + 0.05 - 0.05w1
0.10 = 0.07w1
w1 = 1.43($100)
w1 = $143;
(1 - w1)$100 = $100 - $143
(1 - w1)$100 = -$43
Answer:
$364,980
Explanation:
Computation for the amount of under- or overapplied overhead for the year.
First step is to calculate the
Predetermined Overhead using this formula
Predetermined Overhead rate = Estimated overhead/direct labor estimated
Let plug in the formula
Predetermined Overhead rate= 358,900/227,000
Predetermined Overhead rate= 158% of direct labor cost
Now let determine the Overhead applied
Overhead applied = $231,000*158%
Overhead applied= $364,980
Therefore the amount of under- or overapplied overhead for the year is $364,980
The answer is "<u>The disagreement between these economists is most likely due to differences in scientific judgments."</u>
It isn't surprising that as the inquiry proceeds with, researchers at times differ about the bearing in which truth lies. Economists regularly differ for a similar reason. Economics is a youthful science, and there is still much to be educated. Economists here and there differ in light of the fact that they have distinctive hunches about the legitimacy of elective hypotheses or about the extent of critical parameters that measure how monetary factors are connected.
