Senate aproveal is a cheak on power of pressidency
Answer:
The correct answer here is A: the fact that the broadcast speech was only available to a limited audience.
Explanation:
When talking about freedom of speech vs. public interest, what judges need to evaluate, when making a ruling about a situation such as this, is how much the public is being affected and to what extent, as in number of people actually being negatively affected, in order to overcome freedom of speech. Freedom of speech, is a right covered by the Constitution, and its protection sometimes supersedes other rights. However, when the affectation is too broad, or can cause damage to other protected rights, depending on how the consequences affect people, and the number of people being affected, then a judge may see fit to curtail, or limit, the freedom of speech. In this case, because it was a limited broadcast, and there is the principle that these viewers could simply decide not to watch, or simply stop paying their subscription, then freedom of speech takes precedence since the damage is limited by numbers.
Answer:
part 1
1 Marco was popular so when he did many people did it
2 trade in Europe expanded in many ways, the Triangle Trade was a major contributor to the economic growth of European nations. ... By supplying a seemingly endless source of slave labor to the American colonies, which were full of natural resources, European markets became flooded with raw materials and consumer goods.
PART 2
1 italy has a powrful gov
so sorry gtg bye
Explanation:
Answer:
C. the ego tries to delay satisfying the id's desires until it can do so safely and successfully
Explanation:
According to Freud, the reality principle is the way in which the ego tries to delay satisfying the id's desires until it can do so safely and successfully.
Based on the number of guidelines for <em>communicating with children about divorce</em> by Ellen Galinsky and Judy David, the one which is NOT a part of the guidelines is to:
- Explain that things will be better soon
According to the given question, we are asked to state the statement which is NOT a part of the guidelines by<em> Ellen and Judy David</em> about telling children about divorce.
As a result of this, we can see that based on the guidelines which were given by Ellen Galinsky and Judy David about <em>communicating with children about divorce</em>, it is important to let them know what is going on, but <em>not to explain that things will be better soon</em>, as this was NOT one of the guidelines.
Read more about divorce here:
brainly.com/question/7138705
