Answer:
im pretty sure it is the second, and third ones.
Explanation:
hope this helps. im pretty sure that this is right
Both communism<span> and </span>socialism<span> are near opposites of capitalism, with no private ownership and class equality. ... The welfare programs like food stamps in the United States are also forms of </span>socialist<span> policies that fit into an otherwise capitalist societ</span>
Answer:
Language
Explanation:
A language is a system that is a combination of arbitrary symbols that can produce an infinite number of meaningful statements. Language defined by the Britannica Encyclopedia is “a system of conventional spoken or written symbols that has meaning to the participants of a specific culture”. As stated before, we use different symbols to create a word that means something to us. Each symbol has each own pronunciation as well as each word. The most interesting part is that each language is very different from each other. There are other symbols and other meanings to words. In conclusion, we can state that with language we have an infinite form of communication; we just need to learn the rules of each language.
Answer:
Although initially conceived of by James Oglethorpe as a refuge for London's indebted prisoners, Georgia was ultimately established in 1732 to protect South Carolina and other southern colonies from Spanish invasion through Florida.
Explanation:
Answer:
Explanation:
Issue: Can an institution of higher learning use race as a factor when making admissions decisions?
Result: The Court held that universities may use race as part of an admissions process so long as "fixed quotas" are not used. The Court determined that the specific system in place at the University of California Medical School was "unnecessary" to achieve the goal of creating a diverse student body and was merely a "fixed quota" and therefore, was unconstitutional.
Importance: The decision started a line of cases in which the Court upheld affirmative action programs. In 2003, such academic affirmative action programs were again directly challenged in Gratz v. Bollinger and Grutter v. Bollinger. In these cases, the Court clarified that admission programs that include race as a factor can pass constitutional muster so long as the policy is narrowly tailored and does not create an automatic preference based on race. The Court asserted that a system that created an automatic race-based preference would in fact violate the Equal Protection Clause.
