Answer:
1. groups costs into meaningful buckets that are then distributed based on the activity or product they support.
Explanation:
Activity based costing basically categorizes various overheads into different activities, that leads to charge of overheads based on different activities.
In this manner overheads that shall be charged on some standard products based on the activities involved is charged accordingly, and not based on standard overhead allocation rate.
Basically the overheads are divided into various activities and then distributed to each product based on the volume of activity in the manufacturing process of such activity.
Answer:
Option D All of the above statements are correct.
Explanation:
The solution of the issue is software integration and making flow of information on timely basis across the company. The recommended solutions given in the question are correct because:
- Establishing a lockbox arrangement is similar to having a single company bank account. This means that the company will have a confirmation from the bank that the payment is received by the bank from customers.
- The remittance advice sent with payment helps to solve the misunderstanding, assist in recording transaction to keep the system updated and provides resistance to fraudulent practice.
- The mailroom personnel who require mailing of trade receivable balance which the customers owe to company and trade payable balance which the company owes to suppliers. This avoids the company paying illegitimate amounts and receiving the amounts which the customers actually should pay to the company.
So all of the statements are correct.
Answer:
D, Flint can simply write ot the SEC to voice his concerns.
Explanation:
Since Flint does not have a case that warrants a court challenge but rather an observation, Flint can simply write to the SEC to intimate them about his observations and/or findings, as well as let the SEC know the position of his company on the rule being proposed by it.
Cheers.
Based on the fact that ActioNOW and Becca entered into an oral contract where Becca agrees to work on a project for ActioNOW for eighteen months, the enforcers of this contract are d. none of the choices.
<h3>Who can enforce this contract?</h3>
This transaction between Becca and ActioNOW was an oral contract which means that it falls under the Statute of Frauds. However, for an oral contract to be enforceable under this Statute, the goods or services exchanged have to be less then $500 in value.
The services or goods also have to be less than 1 year in duration. Because Becca and ActioNow agreed for a contract of 18 months which is more than a year, this contract is not enforceable under the Statute of Frauds and so the government cannot enforce this contract.
Options include:
- a. ActioNOW.
- b. Becca.
- c. any third party, such as ActioNOW’s clients.
- d. none of the choices
Find out more on the Statute of Frauds at brainly.com/question/14854791
#SPJ1
Answer:
Workplace discrimination prevents the firm from using the full potential of those employees that are being discriminated against.
Explanation:
For example, if the firm discriminates against a specific group of people when hiring (for example, it can discriminate against older people), the firm could lose valuable potential employees that could have provided great skill and experience for the firm.
If the firm practices discrimination against employees, the operation in the company will not be as streamlined as it could be against discrimination because those who are being treated poorly will be less motivated and have lesser output.
