Question

byu 220 in gibbons v. ogden, the supreme court ruled that rail companies could not purchase farmland without the consent of farmers. the national government had no say in supervising interstate commerce. states could not restrict trade within their jurisdictions. monopolies were better for the public good than open competition.

Answer 1

In Gibbons v. Ogden, the Supreme Court ruled that rail companies  D. states could not restrict trade within their jurisdictions.

Under the constitution,  rail companies have the electricity to make all laws that shall be vital and proper for carrying into execution the foregoing powers. Aaron Ogden was given permission to function his steamboats in the big apple. Thomas Gibbons changed and allowed to function his steamboats in the big apple.

The ruling in Gibbons v. Ogden asserted Congress's authority to adjust interstate trade on the idea of the Supremacy Clause. It set a precedent that Congress had the strength to overturn country rules if interstate commerce were worried.

The case introduced mild the problem of the trade Clause of the united states charter. It changed into a question of whether or not Congress ought to adjust positive factors of trade. It averted states from establishing similar monopolistic rail companies' legal guidelines, encouraging an increase in steamboat journey and cargo delivery. This increased change opportunities between states, boosting states' economies.

Learn more about rail companies here:-brainly.com/question/11433327

#SPJ4