The court will most likely consider the parties' relative bargaining power.
<u>Option: C</u>
<u>Explanation:</u>
Bargaining power is the collective ability of groups to put control over one another in a circumstance. If all sides are in a dispute on an equivalent basis, then they would have equal bargaining power, such as in a reasonably free market, or between a monopoly and monopsony fairly balanced.
Purchaser bargaining power relates to the leverage customers may impose on businesses to get them to offer higher quality goods, improved customer satisfaction and lower costs. A powerful purchaser will make a market more profitable and diminish the seller's profit potential.
Answer:
The problem of deciding or choosing how to satisfy unlimited wants with limited resources is called economic problem
The best and most correct answer among the choices provided by the question is the first choice. On the other hand, the answer for the second question is the second choice. I hope my answers has come to your help. God bless and have a nice day ahead!
Answer:
d. soft rationing
Explanation:
Soft rationing -
It is the process in which the company itselves takes the decision to limit the amount of capital , which is used for the investment for a given period of time , is known as soft rationing .
It is referred to as soft , as the decision is taken by the firm itself , where the changes and alteration all are done by the firm only according to the future goals and practices .
hence , from the question , the situation given , depicts - soft rationing .
