Answer:
A per se violation
Explanation:
A per se violation is one that violates antitrust laws for example agreements made that violates the Sherman antitrust act. It has adverse effects on the competitiveness of a market.
Sherman antitrust act of 1980 is aimed at regulating competitiveness in a market. It prohibits anticompetitive agreements, and unilateral activities that tries to monopolize a market.
In this scenario Omega corporation and precision products, inc., are the principal suppliers of their product in their market. They make an agreement that one will focus on retailers and the other on wholesalers.
This is an attempt to monopolize the market by the two principal suppliers, and is a violation of the Sherman antitrust act.
Answer:
$10
Explanation:
Steve achieved a producer surplus of $10, which is commensurate with the value of the 6-pack of beer he received from his neighbor. This means he practically sold the old surfboard for $10.
The variable expense ratio for paprika is 27%.
<h3>V
ariable expense ratio</h3>
Using this formula
Variable expense ratio=Variable cost/Selling price
Where:
Variable cost=$2.43
Selling price=$9
Let plug in the formula
Variable expense ratio=2.43/9×100
Variable expense ratio=27%
Inconclusion the variable expense ratio for paprika is 27%.
Learn more about variable expense ratio here:brainly.com/question/15684424
Answer:
"Opt-out
" is the correct answer.
Explanation:
- A paradigm using the implicit authorization of existing people who receive is considered as Opt-out model, consumers are considered ready to consume the communications even though they have sufficient choice to decline such.
- This is indeed a phrase being used for the approach regarding direct sales messaging from the States.
