1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
hoa [83]
3 years ago
11

Which of the following statements does not describe a motivation by the buyer or seller in the acquisition or sale of a company?

Multiple Choice Buyers generally prefer to buy assets because they can take a tax basis in the assets acquired equal to the assets' fair market value. Buyers generally prefer to buy stock because they can take a tax basis in the underlying assets of the company acquired equal to the assets' fair market value. Sellers generally prefer to sell assets in a tax-deferred reorganization to avoid higher tax rates imposed on gains from the sale of non-capital assets. Sellers generally prefer to sell stock because they can recognize capital gain on the sale taxed at preferential rates.
Business
1 answer:
vichka [17]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

The following statement is not true: <u>Buyers generally prefer to buy stock because they can take a tax basis in the underlying assets of the </u>

<u>company acquired equal to the assets' fair market value.</u>

Explanation:

Acquisition of a company is like buying and selling of a product. You can't sell unless you have a buyer and vice versa. Acquisition can be defined as the process in which a company buys most or all of the shares of the other company with the motive to gain control. In the process of acquisition, the sellers are motivated to sell in tax deferred reorganization in order to avoid higher tax rates on gain from sale. Also, they sell stocks with the motive to have capital gain on sale taxed at preferential rates. The buyers, on the other hand, prefer to buy stock so that they can have a tax basis in the assets acquired which is equal to assets' fair market value.

You might be interested in
A. Adjustments would not be necessary if financial statements were prepared to reflect net income from lifetime operations.
Artemon [7]

Answer:

The correct answer is A

Explanation:

In accounting the adjustment, is described as the transaction of the business, which is not involved or recorded in the records of the accounting of the firm at a particular or a specific data.

All of the transactions are reported by the recordation and its example are customer billing, cash collection and supplier invoice.

If the operations of the lifetime are reflected from the net income, then the adjustments does not needed to passed or reported.

7 0
3 years ago
If an economist argues that everyone gains from trade, what reasoning is most likely underlying her argument?
mylen [45]

Answer:

If an economist argues that everyone gains from trade, the following reasoning is most likely underlying her argument:

  • Production according to the principle of comparative advantage lowers overall costs and therefore allows both countries to have a higher standard of living.

Explanation:

  • The comparative advantage refer to the situation in which an individual, company or a country offers its services and products at a lower rate as compared to its competitor. This leads to trade-off as you have to comprise for the gain of something.
  • This comparative advantage also increase the dependencies of nations or companies on each other.
  • For example, England and Portugal has benefited from this comparative advantage concept as England get the wine at lower cost from Portugal and Portugal also get earning by selling this wine to England.
4 0
3 years ago
Dobbs Company issues 6%, two-year bonds, on December 31, 2018, with a par value of $106,000 and semi-annual interest payments.
Rashid [163]

Answer: See explanation

Explanation:

a. The issuance of bonds on December 31, 2018.

Dec 31, 2018.

Debit Cash $99880

Debit Discount on bonds payable $6120

Credit Bonds payable $106000

(to record bond issue)

b. The first through fourth interest payments on each June 30 and December 31.

June 30

Debit Interest expense = $4718

Credit Discount on bonds payable = $1538

Credit Cash (106000×6%×6/12) = $3180

(To record interest)

Dec, 31.

Debit Interest expense = $4718

Credit Discount on bonds payable = $1538

Credit Cash (106000×6%×6/12) = $3180

(To record interest)

June 30

Debit Interest expense = $4718

Credit Discount on bonds payable = $1538

Credit Cash (106000×6%×6/12) = $3180

(To record interest)

Dec, 31

Debit Interest expense = $4718

Credit Discount on bonds payable = $1538

Credit Cash (106000×6%×6/12) = $3180

(To record interest)

c. The maturity of the bonds on December 31, 2020.

Dec 31,2020

Debit Bonds payable = $106000

Credit Cash = $106000

(To record retirement)

5 0
3 years ago
Homer Corp. is considering the purchase of a new piece of equipment. The cost savings from the equipment would result in an annu
kotegsom [21]

Answer:

$165,000

Explanation:

The computation of the annual net cash flow is shown below:

But before that first we have to find the depreciation expense which is

= (Initial cost - Salvage Value) ÷  estimated life

= ($400,000 - $75,000) ÷ 5 years

= $65,000

Now the annual net cash flow is

= Depreciation expense + Net Income

= $65,000 + $100,000

= $165,000

We simply added the depreciation expense and the net income so that the annual net cash flow could come

4 0
3 years ago
Suppose there is a simultaneous increase in demand and decrease in supply, what effect will this have on the equilibrium price?
Sunny_sXe [5.5K]

Although the impact on the equilibrium quantity cannot be determined, a rise in demand and a decrease in supply will result in an increase in the equilibrium price. 1. Consumers now place a higher value on goods, and producers must charge a higher price to offer the goods; as a result, prices will rise for all quantities.

If demand increases at the same time as supply increases, as is the case in the scenario depicted, the new equilibrium price will be greater than the initial equilibrium price.

We therefore know that an increase in supply decreases equilibrium price and increases quantity, while a rise in supply increases equilibrium price and decreases quantity (and vice versa) (and vice versa).

To learn more on equilibrium price

brainly.com/question/14480835

#SPJ4

5 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • What is a way to protect your social security number and other sensitive information from identity theft
    11·2 answers
  • York’s outstanding stock consists of 80,000 shares of noncumulative 7.5% preferred stock with a $5 par value and also 200,000 sh
    10·1 answer
  • On October 1, 2016, Concord Corp. issued $924,000, 7%, 10-year bonds at face value. The bonds were dated October 1, 2016, and pa
    15·1 answer
  • When a government creates a budget, it is seeking a way to spend as much revenue as possible. cut spending to a bare minimum. re
    15·2 answers
  • Annabelle is a law enforcement officer whose job often entails patrolling a neighborhood that is far from the sheriff’s office.
    10·1 answer
  • Hammoudi Company uses the weighted-average method in its process costing system. The first processing department, the Welding De
    15·1 answer
  • Which of these pieces of information would fit in a career plan's career requirements section? Check all that apply.
    10·2 answers
  • As a preferred stockholder, you are entitled to numerous preferences and privileges over common stockholders. If you are a prefe
    9·1 answer
  • Assume just for this question that the portfolios have identical betas, but one has high investment-specific risk (standard devi
    8·1 answer
  • Suppose that a particular artillery piece has a range r = 4000 yards . find its range in miles. use the facts that 1mile=5280ft
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!