Continental drift is the geological phenomenon in which continents move. These movements at speeds of a few centimeters per year can actually be measured since the advent of satellite geodesy. The movement of continents is caused by plate tectonics.
Alfred Wegener noted at the beginning of the 20th century that the edges of some continents (particularly South America and Africa) are similar in shape, concluding that the continents were connected and separated before. The problem was that it was not known how huge land masses could move across the Earth's surface. Such a movement requires enormous power and it was not known where it came from.
Later it was known that, according to plate tectonics, the continents move as a result of convection currents in the mantle. They slowly move away from each other, bump into each other, slide under each other, or rub against each other. This causes various surface phenomena, such as earthquakes, volcanism, and slow changes, such as subsidence, mountain building and the displacement of continents.
Learn more in brainly.com/question/19472435
Answer:
In 1debate over the issue, Kentucky Senator Henry Clay proposed another compromise. It had four parts: first, California would enter the Union as a free state; second, the status of slavery in the rest of the Mexican territory would be decided by the people who lived there; third, the slave trade (but not slavery) would be abolished in Washington, D.C.; and fourth, a new Fugitive Slave Act would enable Southerners to reclaim runaway slaves who had escaped to Northern states where slavery was not allowed.
Bleeding Kansas
But the larger question remained unanswered. In 1854, Illinois Senator Stephen A. Douglas proposed that two new states, Kansas and Nebraska, be established in the Louisiana Purchase west of Iowa and Missouri. According to the terms of the Missouri Compromise, both new states would prohibit slavery because both were north of the 36º30’ parallel. However, since no Southern legislator would approve a plan that would give more power to “free-soil” Northerners, Douglas came up with a middle ground that he called “popular sovereignty”: letting the settlers of the territories decide for themselves whether their states would be slave or free.
Northerners were outraged: Douglas, in their view, had caved to the demands of the “slaveocracy” at their expense. The battle for Kansas and Nebraska became a battle for the soul of the nation. Emigrants from Northern and Southern states tried to influence the vote. For example, thousands of Missourians flooded into Kansas in 1854 and 1855 to vote (fraudulently) in favor of slavery. “Free-soil” settlers established a rival government, and soon Kansas spiraled into civil war. Hundreds of people died in the fighting that ensued, known as “Bleeding Kansas.”
A decade later, the civil war in Kansas over the expansion of slavery was followed by a national civil war over the same issue. As Thomas Jefferson had predicted, it was the question of slavery in the West–a place that seemed to be the emblem of American freedom–that proved to be “the knell of the union.”
Answer:
umm i think its new jersey plan im so sorry if im wrong feel free to call me the most re tarded person in the world....
Explanation:
Answer:
Cultural Simulation is the tool.
Cultural assimilation is a procedure of social, mental, and social change that originates from the adjusting of two societies while adjusting to the overall culture of the general public. Cultural assimilation is a procedure wherein an individual receives, gets and changes with another social environment.
Explanation:
Cultural assimilation is a procedure of social, mental, and social change that originates from the adjusting of two societies while adjusting to the overall culture of the general public. Cultural assimilation is a procedure wherein an individual receives, gets and changes with another social environment. People of a contrasting society attempt to fuse themselves into the new progressively common culture by taking an interest in parts of the more predominant culture, for example, their customs, yet at the same time clutch their unique social qualities and conventions. The impacts of cultural assimilation can be seen at various levels in both the lover of the overarching society and the individuals who are absorbing into the culture.
At this gathering level, cultural assimilation frequently brings about changes to culture, strict practices, medicinal services, and other social foundations. There are likewise huge consequences on the nourishment, dress, and language of those turning out to be acquainted with the larger culture.
