Answer:
D. Eastern Europe is the correct answer.
Explanation:
Answer: The situation is unconstitutional because it is defamation or libel
Explanation: The freedom of the press is guaranteed by the First Amendment of the American Constitution, which regulates all the rights and obligations of the media, including the press. This means that everyone has the right to freely report and write, and freely express their opinions without censorship. However, there are some limitations when it comes to press freedom. There are, among other things, the extent to which the journalist, i.e the writer of the article, can secure the protection of a confidential source, then also indecency. In this our case it is defamation which, when it comes to defamation in the press, calls libel. If Nancy wanted to make up a story about a politician she personally dislikes, then it is defamation. The First Amendment also does not guarantee the journalist the right to interfere personal feelings about the politician with professional writing in the newspaper. This means that if Nancy made up the story of a politician without real evidence of any wrongdoing, then it was defamation in the newspaper, therefore, libel.
Answer:
its proportional i jus did it lol yw
Explanation:
I believe the correct answer is: high self-monitoring
Mark Snyder, American social psychologist, introduced the
concept of self-monitoring during the 1970s to show how much people monitor
their self-presentations, expressive behavior, and nonverbal affective displays.
He stated in his studies that self-monitoring can be:
1. high self-monitoring
2. low self-monitoring
High self-monitoring individuals closely monitor themselves
and behave in a manner that is highly responsive to social cues and their
situational context.
In this case, Sally is high self-monitoring as she examines
a situation for cues of how she should react, and then tries to meet the
demands of the situation rather than act on her own feelings, before she acts
or speaks.
Explanation:
It is not important only for what we speak but is important to what we write and how to say it. To communicate well this is only not enough to have well-organized ideas expressed concretely and coherently. One must also think about the style tone and clarity of his/her ideas and adapt these elements to read in public. To choose the effective language, the writer must be considered the objective of the documents
<u>Characteristics of an effective language:
</u>
- Concrete and specific not wide and vague.
- Concrete not verbose
- Familiar, not obscure
- Precise and clear not inaccurate and ambiguous
- Constructive, not destructive
- Appropriately formal.
