1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Pepsi [2]
2 years ago
15

For a patient with a postpartum hemorrhage, which intervention should you expect to perform?

Social Studies
1 answer:
Mrac [35]2 years ago
4 0

External uterine massage and bimanual compression techniques are typically utilized as first-line therapy for postpartum hemorrhage patients.

These uterine compression treatments promote uterine contractions that prevent atony and aid in the discharge of clots or the retained placenta. Another compression method that has been tried for severe PPH is aortic compression.

Postpartum hemorrhage treatment options include:

1) Prescription drugs to increase uterine contractions; 2) manual uterine massage (to stimulate contractions)

3) Extraction of any remaining placental fragments from the uterus.

4) The uterus and other pelvic structures are examined.

To learn more about postpartum hemorrhage here

brainly.com/question/4633112

#SPJ4

You might be interested in
The population of the planet doubled in fifty years to reach _______ in 1999?
Amiraneli [1.4K]

Answer:

6 billion

Explanation:

The world's population reached its first billion in 1804.  By the year 1960, there were approximately three billion of people on earth. By the year 1999, the population grew to 6 billion.

According to recent prognostics, by the year 2024, the world's population would reach eight billion people.

The world population is the total number of  humans currently occupying the earth. The highest population growth rates happened between the years 1950-1970.

3 0
3 years ago
How does previous political experience and perceived perception by American voters influence elections?
HACTEHA [7]

Answer:

When asked which statement comes closer to their own views, most Americans (58%) say that “voting gives people like me some say about how government runs things,” while fewer (39%) say “voting by people like me doesn’t really affect how government runs things.”

The public is somewhat more skeptical when it comes to the ability of ordinary citizens to influence the government in Washington. Half (50%) say ordinary citizens can do a lot to influence the government in Washington, if they are willing to make the effort, while about as many (47%) say there’s not much ordinary citizens can do to influence the government.

Can ordinary people have an impact?

Majorities of Democrats and Democratic leaners as well as of Republicans and Republican leaners say that voting gives people some say in government, though this view is somewhat more widely held among Democrats (63%) than Republicans (56%).Those with more education are more likely to say voting gives them a voice in government

Democrats are similarly more likely than Republicans to say ordinary citizens can influence the government in Washington: 55% of Democrats say ordinary citizens can make an impact, while 42% say there is not much ordinary people can do. About as many Republicans and leaners say ordinary citizens can influence the government in Washington (47%) as say there’s not much ordinary citizens can do (51%).

Among the 13% of the public that does not identify or lean toward either party – a group that is far less likely to be registered to vote – just 44% say voting gives people some say in how government runs things, while 49% say it doesn’t really affect how government runs things.

Seven-in-ten of those with a post-graduate degree (70%) and 65% of those with a college degree say voting gives people some say in government; somewhat smaller shares of those with only some college experience (58%) or those with no more than a high school diploma (51%) say the same.

Unlike views on voting, there are no educational differences in the shares saying ordinary people can influence government if they make the effort.Scale of political efficacy

Blacks (58%) and Hispanics (57%) are more likely than whites (47%) to say that ordinary citizens can influence the government in Washington, if they’re willing to make the effort. There are no racial differences in views of the impact of voting.

These two measures of opinion on the impact of voting and on ordinary citizens’ ability to influence the government in Washington can be combined to create a scale of political efficacy. Those who rank “high” on the scale say both that voting gives people some say in how government runs things and that ordinary citizens can do a lot to influence the government in Washington, if they are willing to make the effort. “Medium” political efficacy includes those who hold only one of the two views, while “low” political efficacy describes those who do not hold either view.

Overall, 39% of the public falls into the high political efficacy category, while 33% have medium political efficacy and 28% have low political efficacy.

Political efficacy is higher among those with more education. For example, 47% of those with a post-graduate degree rank high on the scale of political efficacy, compared with 33% of those with no more than a high school diploma.

5 0
3 years ago
PLS HELP I'LL GIVE U BRAINLIEST PLS
maxonik [38]

Answer:

government

Explanation:

the power elite are the key people in the three major institutions of modern society: 1) Economy; 2) Government; and 3) Military. The bureaucracies of state, corporations, and military have become enlarged and centralized and are a means of power never before equaled in human history. These hierarchies of power are the key to understanding modern industrial societies

4 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
During a ________ task, 4-year-old marissa is asked whether there are more oranges or fruits in a group of two apples, one banan
qaws [65]
Blank 1 = class inculsion. 

Blank 2 = she will say that there are more oranges. 
7 0
3 years ago
In two to three paragraphs, hypothesize about the effect the local topography had on the wars. In what ways did the Vietnamese a
andreyandreev [35.5K]

The correct answer to this open question is the following.

The effect the local topography had on the wars. The ways in which the Vietnamese adapted their fighting strategies to the physical geography of the region were determined in the result of the war. The terrain of the Vietnam Cong resulted in a key aspect that favored the war tactics against US troops. Geographical features were very complicated for the American troops to operate with success.

We are talking about the regions of the Red River Delta, the Mekong Delta, the Northern Highlands, the Coastal Lowlands, and the Annamite Mountain Range.

The Vietnamese troops knew the territory like the palm of their hand, and this gave them a huge advantage.  

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • The media reports that a research study found that students learn better if they eat chocolate while reading. If your teacher in
    13·1 answer
  • In which Crusades did Saladin and King Richard I fight?
    7·2 answers
  • What is the Electoral College and how does it help decide the presidency?
    15·1 answer
  • “The French revolution and those in North and South America have been transformed into founding myths in their respective countr
    6·1 answer
  • Please help ASAP
    9·2 answers
  • The first three steps in john dewey's reflective-thinking process are as follows:
    6·1 answer
  • Evaluate two ways in which the media could impact our values and beliefs about marriage in a negative way
    10·1 answer
  • What was the most important influence on the American Founders?
    7·1 answer
  • Major function of the National Labor Relations Board is to
    6·1 answer
  • Which of the following best describes the cause world war 1
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!