First question, yes. it is very possible
second question, I'm not too sure
In each case naturally the intention for the first action existed, or it would not have been carried out. It is doubtful in the extreme that the initiators of those actions foresaw the full consequences of those actions, especially as the full scale of the consequences did not become apparent for hundreds of years.
<span>So in all three cases the answer must be that the consequences were not intentional.</span>
Answer:
The question is not complete, but I will be explaining one or two things here so that you will be able to tackle a similar question.
Explanation:
According to researches conducted by neuroscientists, it has been observed that children process language since birth( even since when they are in the womb).
According to the question, Christopher is a 5-month-old American and he is exposed solely to English language. If Christopher hears another different language, he would know that the new language is different what the normal(English) that he has been listening to for some times. Christopher would have been processing the information of the English language, so he will be able to know that he is now listening to a different language. Infants have some kind of ''phonetic stimuli' controlled by the Brain.
CONCLUSION: INFANTS ARE ABLE TO DIFFERENTIATE SOUNDS OF ANY LANGUAGE.
The method that is recommended for climbing a tree to enter an elevated stand is to always use three points of contact with your hands and feet.
<h3>What is a Safety Guideline?</h3>
This refers to the set of rules or steps that a person has to take in order to safely execute a thing with the minimum of risk.
Hence, we can see that the recommended method to be used to climb a tree to enter an elevated stand is to use three points of contact with your hands and feet and also to keep a firm hold and not let go.
Read more about safety guidelines here:
brainly.com/question/14367881
#SPJ1
