Chronic, low-grade depressed feelings are to "dysthymic" disorder as moderate, recurring mood swings are to "<span>cyclothymic"</span> disorder.
Dysthymic disorder is a genuine condition of interminable discouragement, which holds on for no less than two years (one year for youngsters and youths). Dysthymia is less intense and serious than significant depressive issue.
In cyclothymic disorder, temperaments swing between brief times of mellow wretchedness and hypomania, a raised disposition. The low and high emotional episodes never achieve the seriousness or length of significant depressive or full insanity scenes.
Ok but like what’s the question u need an image or something
The question asks, "What is YOUR philosophy?" I can't really tell you what YOU should think ... but I can present for you the ideas of a couple different political philosophers who took opposing stands on the issue.
Thomas Hobbes and John Locke were both English philosophers who wrote during the 17th century.
Hobbes published a famous work called <em>Leviathan </em>in 1651. The title "Leviathan" comes from a biblical word for a great and mighty beast. Hobbes believed government is formed by people for the sake of their personal security and stability in society. In Hobbes view, once the people put a king (or other leader in power), then that leader needs to have supreme power (like a great and mighty beast). The people are too divided and too volatile as individuals -- everyone looking out for his own interests. So for security and stability, authority and the power of the law needs to be in the hands of a powerful ruler like a king or queen. That was Hobbes' view.
John Locke famously published <em>Two Treatises on Civil Government </em>in 1690. According to Locke's view, a government's power to govern comes from the consent of the people themselves -- those who are to be governed. This was a change from the previous ideas of "divine right monarchy" -- that a king ruled because God appointed him to be the ruler. Locke repudiated the views of divine right monarchy in his <em>First Treatise on Civil Government. </em> In his <em>Second Treatise on Civil Government, </em> Locke argued for the rights of the people to create their own governments according to their own desires and for the sake of protecting their own life, liberty, and property. Locke always favored the people remaining in charge, and asserted that the people have the power to change their government and remove government leaders if the government is not properly serving the needs and well-being of the people.
As you write your own answer to this question for your class, you will want to decide, perhaps, if you agree more with Hobbes, that security and stability are most important ... or with Locke, that the authority and liberty of the people are always paramount.
The correct answer is <span>e. the conflict that arises from occupying social positions that are ranked differently
Status i</span>nconsistency refers to the phenomenon where an individual possesses status qualities that rank as both relatively high as well as relatively low. Some examples of status inconsistency include an intelligent graduate student who has to work as a dish washer to pay for bills, or a wealthy man who is a serving a prison sentence and is adjusting to a sub par lifestyle.
The Role of Radio. During the 1994 Rwandan Genocide, radio broadcasts played an important role in inciting ordinary citizens to take part in the massacres of their Tutsi, and moderate Hutu, neighbours. ... This led the Hutu Power circle around President Habyarimana and his wife to found RTLM as a private radio station.
