1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
GaryK [48]
1 year ago
11

Please help reward 50 points!

World Languages
1 answer:
natka813 [3]1 year ago
4 0

Answer: The Answer is Celer Magnus

Explanation:

Celer is the Latin word for swift, as can be seen in words such as accelerate, would be the first half of the Latin translation of swift, large animal. Magnus, which is the Latin word for large, as can be seen in magnify, would be the second half, completing the large and swift portions of a large, swift animal. Magnus celer animal directly translates to "A big, swift animal"

You might be interested in
How do say I don't want that thank you in Japanese
Ratling [72]

Explanation:

ありがとうしたくない

hope this helps you

have a nice day

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
A word having a meaning that is the same or nearly the same as another word is a(n) _____. noun synonym antonym
kobusy [5.1K]

Answer: synonym

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which of the following best reveals a person's character?
Nina [5.8K]
Talents and athleticism can't be true because I could be both but be the evilest person ever to live.
Background can't be right because I can come from a "broken down" or "terrible" background but end up changing or become someone different later on in life.
I'd have to go with reputation because a person's character is based on thier reputation...
(Hoped I helpes)
4 0
3 years ago
QUICK HELP!!!!! What does it mean to you when it says "Peace cannot be kept by force, it can only be achieved by understanding
irinina [24]
Peace cannot be kept by force; it can only be achieved by understanding<span>. ... Please realize that </span>understanding does<span> not </span>mean<span> agreement. </span>You<span> can </span>understand<span> someone, their comments and their motivations ... If it </span>helps<span>, like a salve for your ego, many </span>say<span> that it takes a better person to take that first step.

</span>
8 0
3 years ago
3. the first amendment to the constitution prevents the government from interfering with the free exercise of religion. the litu
Dimas [21]

Answer:

False.

Explanation:

The 1st Amendment states, quote:

<em> Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof...</em>

Now, this may be seen as the government not being able to interfere with banning the practice of human sacrifice. However, based on <em>Reynolds v. U.S. </em>(1878), The Supreme Court ruled that religious duty is not a defense against criminal indictment.

On top of that, human sacrifice in the modern world is deemed as a murder, as the victim is typically not consenting. If, however, they are, it may still be deemed as manslaughter. Under <em>Section 18 of the US Code 1111</em>, Murder is defined as, quote <em>the unlawful killing of a human being with malice aforethought... or premeditated design unlawfully and maliciously to effect death of any human being other than him who is killed</em>. (Section a, Section 18, U.S. Code 1111).

Within the religious liberties that are protected by federal law, it is stated under <em>Executive Order 13798 </em>(82 FR 21675 - Promoting Free Speech and Religious Liberty). The most important part to look at from this order is section 2, which states that <em>The free exercise of religion includes the right to act or abstain from action in accordance from one's religious beliefs</em>, and in section 10, which states that the given act <em>prohibits the federal government from substantially burdening any aspect of religious observance or practice, </em><em>unless imposition of that burden on a particular religious adherent satisfies strict scrutiny. </em> (Emphasis added, Federal Law Protections for Religious Liberty, RFRA 1993). In this case, the scrutiny is satisfied as the religious practice breaks US Code 1111 Section 18, as stated above. Therefore, <em>the government can be allowed to interfere with this particular practice. </em>

<u>Laws & rights in use in this case, as well as court decisions:</u>

- 1st Amendment, U.S. Constitution

- <em>Reynolds v. U.S. </em>(1878) - Chief Justice Morrison Waite.

- Section 18, US Code 1111

- Executive Order 13798

- Federal Law Protections for Religious Liberty, Religious Freedom Restoration act, 1993.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Learn more about Religious Freedom, here:

brainly.com/question/4773712 - Freedom of religious worship is guaranteed by...

<em />

3 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • Excerpt from The Ultimate Fighting Championship
    11·1 answer
  • Read this excerpt from “Down by the Salley Gardens” by William Butler Yeats.
    8·2 answers
  • I need help please thanks
    6·1 answer
  • Subukin ang iyong nalalaman, sagutin ang CROSSWORD
    15·1 answer
  • What are prefixes and suffixes? <br><br><br> *JUST FOR KIDS WHO NEED HELP*
    10·1 answer
  • United states says it will help the philippines against the Chinese but why isn't the United States helping our Filipinos anymor
    10·1 answer
  • Which strategy can help you understand and enjoy classic literature?
    12·1 answer
  • Choose the best form of the word Quintus to fill in the blank in the following sentence:
    9·1 answer
  • American sign language question
    9·2 answers
  • Redacteaza un text in care sa-i oferi un raspuns argumentat/solutie la intrebarea:
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!