Answer: unreliability
Explanation: Some of the problems that determine the quality of an experiment are reliability and validity.
Reliability considers the consistency of the experiment. In the example above, the result of the second sample is inconsistent with the result of the first sample, making Watt's research unreliable. That is, it does not reflect the ratings of a larger population. This problem can be solved by increasing the sample size, such that the average ratings are more reflective of a wider audience.
Validity considers the accuracy of the experiment. A lack of reliability of an experiment will likely make the result invalid as well, but this is not always the case.
Oh gosh lol was so mad oh okie so cute ☺️
Federal judges are appointed BY the executive branch(the president)confirmed by the legislative branch(senate) and the judges end up in the judicial branch<span />
It is false that because people involved in collective behavior do so anonymously and are swept up by the power of suggestion, they cannot legally be held responsible for their behavior.
<u>Explanation:</u>
Collective behavior is the behavior exhibited by particular group of people who tend to remain together for short lived social interactions. Any person can join in this as a member. During any religious revival meeting or showing their hatred towards norms that are contradictory, people join together collectively.
The social movements emerge due to some reasons then they face either success or failure and then after sometime they decline. Sometimes this collective behavior is swept by the power of suggestion involved in vandalism and riots which is a form of civil disorder.
Asia. I looked in my World History textbook.
