1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
adelina 88 [10]
1 year ago
12

What is the roi if the total benefits are $182,000 and the total cumulative costs are $120,000?

Business
1 answer:
anzhelika [568]1 year ago
7 0

The ROI  if the total benefits are $182,000 and the total cumulative costs are $120,000 is 51.67%

What is ROI?

ROI means return on investment , it is the profit as a percentage of the cumulative costs incurred to earn the profit, in other words, we can determine the ROI in this case as the total benefits minus cumulative costs divided by the cumulative costs

ROI=(total benefits-total cumulative costs)/total cumulative costs

total benefits=$182,000

total cumulative costs=$120,000

ROI=($182,000-$120,000)/$120,000

ROI=51.67%

Find out more about ROI on:brainly.com/question/14278738

#SPJ1

You might be interested in
What happens to the equilibrium price when supply goes down? A. The price goes up. B. The price goes down. C. The price stays th
Nady [450]
When supply goes down, the equilibrium price goes up. This is because if there is a smaller supply the good becomes more valuable to people who want the good.
4 0
3 years ago
The most useful allocation basis for the departmental costs of an advertising campaign for a storewide sale is likely to be: Mul
azamat

Answer:

Proportion of sales of each department.

Explanation:

Advertising expense directly effects the sales of the business. As the campaign is made store-wide sales and it does not directly traceable to any specific department. It need proper basis for allocation of expenses. The proportion of sales of each department is the most suitable basis from all of the given options because the share of benefit from the campaign is received in the form of sale. A campaign might mostly effects the sales.

3 0
3 years ago
The table below presents the average and marginal cost of producing cheeseburgers per hour at a roadside diner.
Butoxors [25]

Answer:

a. At a quantity of 40 cheeseburgers per hour, the average total cost of production is<u> falling </u>and the marginal cost of cheeseburger production is <u>rising</u>.

b. At a quantity of 60 cheeseburgers per hour, the average variable cost of production is <u>  rising </u> and the average total cost of cheeseburger production is <u>at a minimum</u>.

Explanation:

a. At a quantity of 40 cheeseburgers per hour, the average total cost of production is<u> </u><em><u>falling </u></em>and the marginal cost of cheeseburger production is <em><u>rising</u></em>.

From the table in the question, it can be observed that the average total cost of production at a quantity of 30 cheeseburgers per hour is higher than the average total cost of production at a quantity of 40 cheeseburgers per hour, while the average total cost of production at a quantity of 50 cheeseburgers per hour is lower than the average total cost of production at a quantity of 40 cheeseburgers per hour. This implies that at a quantity of 40 cheeseburgers per hour, the average total cost of production is<u> falling.</u>

Also from the table in the question, it can be observed that the marginal cost of production at a quantity of 30 cheeseburgers per hour is lower than the marginal cost of production at a quantity of 40 cheeseburgers per hour, while the marginal cost of production at a quantity of 50 cheeseburgers per hour is higher than the marginal cost of production at a quantity of 40 cheeseburgers per hour. This implies that at a quantity of 40 cheeseburgers per hour, the marginal cost of production is<u> rising.</u>

b. At a quantity of 60 cheeseburgers per hour, the average variable cost of production is <u> </u><em><u> rising</u></em><u> </u> and the average total cost of cheeseburger production is <em><u>at a minimum</u></em>.

From the table in the question, it can be observed that the average variable cost of production at a quantity of 50 cheeseburgers per hour is lower than the average variable cost of production at a quantity of 60 cheeseburgers per hour, while the average variable cost of production at a quantity of 70 cheeseburgers per hour is higher than the average variable cost of production at a quantity of 60 cheeseburgers per hour. This implies that at a quantity of 60 cheeseburgers per hour, the average variable cost of production is<u> rising.</u>

Also from the table in the question, it can be observed that the average total cost of cheeseburger production at quantities of 50 and 60 cheeseburgers per hour are equal and the lowest on the table, this implies that the average total cost of cheeseburger production is <u>at a minimum</u> at a quantity of 60 cheeseburgers per hour.

7 0
3 years ago
eBook Problem Walk-Through Byron Books Inc. recently reported $12 million of net income. Its EBIT was $28.6 million, and its tax
snow_lady [41]

Answer:

Earnings Before Tax (EBT) =  $16,000,000

Interest expense = $12,600,000

Explanation:

Earnings Before Tax (EBT) =  Net Income  / (1 - Tax Rate)

Earnings Before Tax (EBT) =  $12,000,000 / ( 1 - 0.25)

Earnings Before Tax (EBT) =  $12,000,000 / 0.75

Earnings Before Tax (EBT) =  $16,000,000

Interest expense =  Earnings Before Interest and taxes (EBIT) - Earnings Before taxes (EBT)

Interest expense = $28,600,000 - $16,000,000

Interest expense = $12,600,000

              Income Statement

Details                               Amount

EBIT                                  $28,600,000

Less: Interest expenses  <u>$12,600,000</u>

EBT                                   $16,000,000

Tax at 25%                       <u>$4,000,000</u>

Net Income                      $12,000,000

4 0
3 years ago
The Cutting Department of Sheridan Company has the following production and cost data for July.
alina1380 [7]

Answer:

1.                                                                   Materials       Conversion Costs

Total equivalent units of production        17,200                  15,800  

2. Cost per Equivalent Unit                    $ 4.05                           $ 2.6

Explanation:

Cutting Department

Weighted-Average Method

1. Equivalent Units

Particulars              Units       % of Completion       Equivalent Units

                                     Materials Conversion   Materials Conversion

Transferred Out    13,700     100         100             13,700      13,700

<u>Ending Inventory     3500      100          60             3500        2100    </u>

<u>Total Equivalent Units                                             17,200      15,800  </u>

<em>The Ending Inventory  units are 3500 which are not yet complete. </em>

                                                                   Materials       Conversion Costs

Total equivalent units of production        17,200                  15,800  

2. Cost Per Equivalent Units

                                                    Materials         Conversion

Cost Added                               69,660                18,480 + 22,600

                             

Total Costs                                69,660                  41,080

Equivalent Units                       <u> 17,200                    15,800 </u>

Cost per Equivalent Unit             69,660 / 17,200         41,080/ 15,800  

                                                    $ 4.05                           $ 2.6

Cost of Ending Work In Process  $ 19635

Materials = 3500 * $ 4.05= $ 14175

Conversion = 2100 * $ 2.6=  $ 5460

We multiply the equivalent number of units with the cost per unit to find the cost.

Cost Of Units Transferred Out = $ 91,105

Materials = 13,700 * $ 4.05= $ 55,485

Conversion = 13,700 * $ 2.6 =  $ 35620

B. A Cost Reconciliation Report

                                    Materials              Conversion

Ending WIP                     $ 14175                  $ 5460

<u>Transferred Out             $ 55,485              $ 35620</u>

<u />

<u>Total                                 $ 69660                 41080   </u>

These calculated costs reconcile with the costs given in the above data.

                                                  Materials              Conversion

<u>Cost Added                               69,660                18,480 + 22,600</u>

<u>Total Costs                                69,660                  41,080</u>

<u></u>

These costs reconcile with the given costs.

5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Alpha Company makes all its sales on account. Accounts receivable payment experience is as follows: Percent paid in the month of
    8·1 answer
  • If all other factors are equal, what will happen to the demand if the price of a product goes down? A. Demand will go up. B. Dem
    10·2 answers
  • Which type of account typically has low liquidity? AMoney Market Account BCertificate of Deposit (CD) CChecking Account DSavings
    6·1 answer
  • In 2018, Bratten Fitness Company made the following cash purchases:
    12·1 answer
  • How walmart motivate thier employees?
    8·1 answer
  • "in year 1, costello company performed $14,000 of services for a customer who paid immediately. it also incurred $6,000 of wage
    14·1 answer
  • Adams Furniture receives a special order for 10 sofas for a special price of $3,000. The direct m als and direct labor for each
    7·1 answer
  • Economists normally assume that the goal of a firm is to
    15·1 answer
  • Wilson, Inc., has a current stock price of $43.00. For the past year, the company had net income of $7,100,000, total equity of
    7·1 answer
  • What is another term for the part
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!