The 3 main layers are the crust, the mantle, and the core. The crust consists of everything you see- dirt, rock, minerals, and everything you can see. We live on the crust, and it floats around on the magma in pieces we call continents. The next layer is the mantle, which is where all the magma is- this is what the crust floats on. It consists of molten rock and minerals; the bottom layer of the crust is continually melting under the extreme heat, but it is replaced when volcanoes spew the magma back onto the surface. The last layer is the core, an extremely fast-spinning ball of heavy metals. It is split into two layers; inner and outer core. The outer core is mostly an alloy of nickel and iron with some other heavy metals thrown in, like platinum and gold, but the inner core is almost solid iron. It is so hot that it should be melted, but the pressure of everything on top of it makes it so it has nowhere to melt to, keeping it solid.
Hope this helps!!! ^_^
<u>Answer:
</u>
The major political parties in the united states get citizens more interested by including in their manifestos and promising to resolve the issues that are of major concern of majority citizens.
<u>Explanation:
</u>
- The political parties intelligently devise the issues that the current politics can be made to revolve around and be taken political advantage from.
- The issues that bother the citizens on large scale are considered by political leaders as the main issues to fight the elections on so that they are favored by the voters in the elections.
A mediation is an interactive process in which two parties try to resolve a conflict. This method requires the help of a mediator, who is an impartial third party who is specialized in the resolution of conflict through methods such as communication and negotiation techniques.
On the other hand, a neutral case evaluation is a process in which a neutral person examines the evidence and gives his opinion on the case. This is a relatively quick and easy procedure that can help both parties manage their expectations.
I would recommend a mediation in this case. It is clear that both parties have great interest in the dog. However, it is also likely that both parties would want to benefit the dog more than themselves. Because of this, I believe that they would be more open to talking and discussing alternatives. Through mediation, it could be possible for both parties to be reasonably satisfied with the outcome.
pls follow me
Explanation:
<u>Folkways, Mores, Taboo, and Laws.</u>
