Answer:
The answer is option "C"
Explanation:
popular sovereignty is the rule that the authority of a state and its administration are made and supported by the consent of its people, through their chosen agents (rule by the individuals), who are the wellspring of all political force. popular sovereignty communicates an idea, and doesn't really reflect or depict a political reality.
To discuss popular sovereignty is to put extreme expert in the individuals. There are an assortment of manners by which power might be communicated. It could be quick as in individuals make the law themselves, or intervened through delegates who are dependent upon political decision and review; it very well might be extreme as in individuals have a negative or blackball over enactment, or it very well might be something significantly less sensational. So, mainstream sway covers a large number of institutional prospects. For each situation, in any case, popular sovereignty accepts the presence of some type of famous assent, and it is thus that each meaning of conservative government infers a theory of consent.
The effects that can occur when commanders retain tactic
level decision-oriented CCIRs at the operational level in lieu of
decentralizing CCIRs associated with decentralized decision approval levels are
the following;
<span>-
</span>The HQ’s focus will be shifted away from the
setting conditions
<span>-
</span>The agility of the subordinates will slow down
<span>-
</span>The reporting requirements will be added even if
it is unnecessary.
Here is the answer. The person who President James Monroe wanted out of the Western Hemisphere was General Andrew Jackson because he was considered as the hero of the Battle of New Orleans. Hope this answers your question. Have a great day ahead!
Answer:
D. Oxygen
Explanation:
Food molecules are broken down by reacting with oxygen. Just like burning the candle in oxygen. Cells also carry out reactions that join together monomers such as amino acids, sugars, nucleotides, etc., to form long polymer chains.
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Although there are no options attached, we can say the following.
Maisie does not end her friendship with Laura after establishing her comparison level for alternatives because in the comparison of the outcomes when comparing the alternatives Maisie has, she sees that as her boyfriend is friends with Laura and use to hang out together, it would be very awkward to break the friendship with her knowing that she still has to see Laura when the boys get together.
The interdependence theory invites people to make decisions about staying or not, in a relationship, based on the "cost-benefit" of maintaining that relationship, taking into consideration the consequences.
