Answer:
Raising the Funds through Retained Earnings
WACC = Ke(E/V) + Kp(P/V) + Kd(D/v)(1-T)
WACC = 14.7(0.36) + 12.2(0.06) + 11.1(0.58)(1-0.40)
WACC = 5.292 + 0.732 + 3.8628
WACC = 9.89%
Raising New Equity
WACC = Ke(E/V) + Kp(P/V) + Kd(D/v)(1-T)
WACC = 16.8(0.36) + 12.2(0.06) + 11.1(0.58)(1-0.40)
WACC = 6.048 + 0.732 + 3.8628
WACC = 10.64%
Difference in WACC = 10.64% - 9.89%
= 0.75%
Explanation:
WACC equals cost of equity multiplied by proportion of equity in the capital structure plus cost of preferred stock multiplied by proportion of preferred stock in the capital structure plus after-tax cost of debt multiplied by proportion of debt in the capital structure.
In this case, there is need to calculate WACC if funds were raised through retained earnings and WACC if funds were raised through new common stock. Then, we will determine the difference in WACC.
A leading behavioral economist shows how businesses can improve consumer thinking and decision making on screens. acclaimed behavioral economist shlomo bernatzi reveals a toolkit or interventions for the digital age. using provocative case studies and engaging reader exercises.
Answer:
In economics, the principle of absolute advantage refers to the ability of a party (an individual, or firm, or country) to produce a greater quantity of a good, product, or service than competitors, using the same amount of resources
(i.e : India has an absolute advantage in operating call centers compared to the Philippines because of its low cost of labor and abundant labor force.)
Explanation:
Answer: A business hires a new programmer, so it can't afford to hire a new salesperson.
Explanation:
A P E X: Economics
Answer:
B. The portfolio should be reallocated based on their stated investment objective, reducing the cash and bond percentage by 50% and using the proceeds to buy a small or mid-cap growth mutual fund
Explanation:
Since this couple has stated investment goal of development with moderate hazard, a portfolio that just has about 25% values and that has 75% fixed pay protections is improper - since it will give pay; yet little development. The long haul bond and money designation ought to be decreased and supplanted with development stocks to more readily adjust the portfolio. Decision C is unreasonably theoretical for a "preservationist financial specialist." Choice D is to some degree valid since this couple is putting resources into their manager's stock - yet since the stock just speaks to 8% of the client's all out portfolio, this isn't a too much enormous rate.
